Tools & Wizards About Us
irt.net.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

irt.net.in

::. irt .::

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

255 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

333 ms

irt.net.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to irt.net.in homepage info - get ready to check Irt best content right away, or after learning these important things about irt.net.in

IRT Technologies Pvt. Ltd. - laid its futuristic foundations in the early months of 2010. After Years of Perseverance, Exploring –Conserving Rational Training Ethics and to with a solitary objective...

Visit irt.net.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Irt.net.in page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

irt.net.in performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.5 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

irt.net.in

255 ms

bootstrap.min.css

121 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

129 ms

style.css

117 ms

font-awesome.min.css

149 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Irt.net.in, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (696 ms) belongs to the original domain Irt.net.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 595.0 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

974.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Irt.net.in main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 15.9 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 296.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 892.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Irt needs image optimization as it can save up to 296.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 93.6 kB

  • Original 137.9 kB
  • After minification 136.6 kB
  • After compression 44.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 93.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 188.2 kB

  • Original 220.9 kB
  • After minification 191.1 kB
  • After compression 32.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irt.net.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 188.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (19%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

irt.net.in

irt.net.in

255 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

121 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

129 ms

style.css

style.css

117 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

149 ms

css

css

24 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

155 ms

move-top.js

move-top.js

92 ms

easing.js

easing.js

138 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

186 ms

backcisco.png

backcisco.png

101 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

99 ms

logonew.png

logonew.png

110 ms

red.jpg

red.jpg

86 ms

cisco.jpg

cisco.jpg

101 ms

micro.jpg

micro.jpg

89 ms

NSD.jpg

NSD.jpg

170 ms

CEH.jpg

CEH.jpg

193 ms

pearson.jpg

pearson.jpg

186 ms

oracle.jpg

oracle.jpg

176 ms

vm.jpg

vm.jpg

193 ms

android.jpg

android.jpg

282 ms

ccpp.jpg

ccpp.jpg

282 ms

dotnet.jpg

dotnet.jpg

283 ms

hadoop.jpg

hadoop.jpg

322 ms

php.jpg

php.jpg

244 ms

hp.jpg

hp.jpg

324 ms

ios.jpg

ios.jpg

290 ms

jaava.jpg

jaava.jpg

331 ms

CiscoDC.png

CiscoDC.png

696 ms

9900series_Cisco.jpg

9900series_Cisco.jpg

426 ms

CiscoLab.jpg

CiscoLab.jpg

430 ms

Arshad.jpg

Arshad.jpg

474 ms

Ashutosh%20Tripathi.jpg

Ashutosh%20Tripathi.jpg

386 ms

Saiprasad.jpg

Saiprasad.jpg

387 ms

Amit.jpg

Amit.jpg

472 ms

footer-about.png

footer-about.png

467 ms

flicker-img.jpg

flicker-img.jpg

495 ms

copyrights.png

copyrights.png

497 ms

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf

6 ms

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

11 ms

zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf

zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf

29 ms

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

28 ms

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf

28 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

560 ms

Accessibility Review

irt.net.in accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

irt.net.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

irt.net.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irt.net.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Irt.net.in main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

irt.net.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Irt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: