2.4 sec in total
174 ms
1.9 sec
273 ms
Visit iwto.org now to see the best up-to-date IWTO content for New Zealand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about iwto.org
JOIN US IN ADELAIDE 15-18 APRIL For the 93rd IWTO Congress REGISTER HERE INTERNATIONAL WOOL TEXTILE ORGANISATION PROMOTING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR WOOL From sheep to shop, IWTO represents the interes...
Visit iwto.orgWe analyzed Iwto.org page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
iwto.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value25.9 s
0/100
10%
Value27,860 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value39.2 s
0/100
10%
174 ms
238 ms
84 ms
252 ms
410 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Iwto.org, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (787 ms) belongs to the original domain Iwto.org.
Page size can be reduced by 76.2 kB (14%)
540.4 kB
464.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Iwto.org main page is 540.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 484.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IWTO images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (31%)
75
52
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IWTO. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
iwto.org
174 ms
www.iwto.org
238 ms
screen.css.php
84 ms
main.js.php
252 ms
body-bg.jpg
410 ms
logo.png
95 ms
main-nav-separator.png
174 ms
main-nav-arrow.png
176 ms
main-nav-subniv-bg.png
178 ms
main-nav-subniv2-arrow.png
177 ms
member.png
175 ms
h1-home-bg.png
253 ms
h2-bg-orange.png
254 ms
75-thumbhome.jpg
254 ms
74-thumbhome.jpg
256 ms
73-thumbhome.jpg
257 ms
72-thumbhome.jpg
331 ms
71-thumbhome.jpg
333 ms
70-thumbhome.jpg
333 ms
h2-bg-purple.png
335 ms
28-thumbhome.jpg
338 ms
26-thumbhome.jpg
411 ms
24-thumbhome.jpg
413 ms
22-thumbhome.jpg
414 ms
19-thumbhome.jpg
415 ms
16-thumbhome.jpg
419 ms
14-thumbhome.jpg
486 ms
h2-bg-green.png
488 ms
45-thumbhome.jpg
490 ms
47-thumbhome.jpg
491 ms
h2-bg-blue2.png
495 ms
60-thumbhome.jpg
500 ms
58-thumbhome.jpg
565 ms
59-thumbhome.jpg
567 ms
57-thumbhome.jpg
568 ms
54-thumbhome.jpg
571 ms
52-thumbhome.jpg
576 ms
51-thumbhome.jpg
581 ms
50-thumbhome.jpg
642 ms
ga.js
14 ms
49-thumbhome.jpg
615 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
collect
63 ms
48-thumbhome.jpg
557 ms
45-thumbhome.jpg
480 ms
26-thumbhome.jpg
485 ms
sidebar-item-bg-top.png
491 ms
sidebar-item-bg-bottom.png
549 ms
26-thumb.jpg
787 ms
puce-more-blue.png
479 ms
4-thumb.jpg
479 ms
12-thumb.jpg
566 ms
24-thumb.jpg
572 ms
23-thumb.jpg
548 ms
18-thumb.jpg
478 ms
19-thumb.jpg
477 ms
20-thumb.jpg
551 ms
21-thumb.jpg
552 ms
11-thumb.jpg
630 ms
5-thumb.jpg
496 ms
linkedin-icon.png
498 ms
facebook-icon.png
552 ms
youtube-icon.png
553 ms
fancy_closebox.png
579 ms
fancy_shadow_n.png
572 ms
fancy_shadow_ne.png
556 ms
fancy_shadow_e.png
555 ms
fancy_shadow_se.png
555 ms
fancy_shadow_s.png
556 ms
fancy_shadow_sw.png
577 ms
fancy_shadow_w.png
574 ms
fancy_shadow_nw.png
556 ms
fancy_left.png
555 ms
fancy_right.png
555 ms
fancy_title_left.png
554 ms
fancy_title_main.png
576 ms
fancy_title_right.png
572 ms
screen.css.php
82 ms
iwto.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
iwto.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
iwto.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iwto.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Iwto.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
iwto.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IWTO. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: