Tools & Wizards About Us
medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com

Medical Journals|Peer Reviewed |High Impact Articles list

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

490 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

283 ms

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Medical Clinicalreviews Imedpub content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com

List of highly accessed peer reviewed open access articles in Medical and Clinical. 2015 Journal rank, impact factors and indexing.

Visit medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 490 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,210 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com

490 ms

imed_bootstrap.css

962 ms

imed_external_style.css

956 ms

css

80 ms

jquery.coolautosuggest.css

1957 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com, 50% (15 requests) were made to Imedpub.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Imedpub.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 270.6 kB (55%)

Content Size

487.8 kB

After Optimization

217.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com main page is 487.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 189.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 42.7 kB

  • Original 53.4 kB
  • After minification 42.3 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 68.7 kB
  • After minification 64.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medical Clinicalreviews Imedpub images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 63.2 kB

  • Original 176.1 kB
  • After minification 176.1 kB
  • After compression 112.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 36% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 160.8 kB

  • Original 189.6 kB
  • After minification 159.7 kB
  • After compression 28.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medical Clinicalreviews Imedpub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com

490 ms

imed_bootstrap.css

imed_bootstrap.css

962 ms

imed_external_style.css

imed_external_style.css

956 ms

css

css

80 ms

jquery.coolautosuggest.css

jquery.coolautosuggest.css

1957 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

88 ms

jquery.coolautosuggest.js

jquery.coolautosuggest.js

2526 ms

jquery.coolfieldset.js

jquery.coolfieldset.js

2525 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

51 ms

btn_home.png

btn_home.png

384 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

48 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

96 ms

plagscan-logo.jpg

plagscan-logo.jpg

74 ms

medical--clinical-reviews-banner.jpg

medical--clinical-reviews-banner.jpg

2615 ms

recent_jrnal.png

recent_jrnal.png

1021 ms

medical--clinical-reviews-flyer.jpg

medical--clinical-reviews-flyer.jpg

1018 ms

medical--clinical-reviews-indeximage.jpg

medical--clinical-reviews-indeximage.jpg

1085 ms

88x31.png

88x31.png

27 ms

btn_home.png

btn_home.png

712 ms

body_bg-ptrn.png

body_bg-ptrn.png

69 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

19 ms

ic_mailus.png

ic_mailus.png

87 ms

btn_search.png

btn_search.png

90 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

plagscan-logo.jpg

plagscan-logo.jpg

80 ms

arrow_right.png

arrow_right.png

70 ms

counter.js

counter.js

17 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

t.php

t.php

49 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

medical-clinical-reviews.imedpub.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Medical Clinicalreviews Imedpub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: