Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

secure.ipower.com

Domain Names and Web Hosting by IPOWER

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

61 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

260 ms

secure.ipower.com screenshot

About Website

Visit secure.ipower.com now to see the best up-to-date Secure IPOWER content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about secure.ipower.com

Small business web hosting offering additional business services such as: domain name registrations, email accounts, web services, online community resources and various small business solutions.

Visit secure.ipower.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Secure.ipower.com page load time and found that the first response time was 61 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

secure.ipower.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

secure.ipower.com

61 ms

secure.ipower.com

84 ms

www.ipower.com

313 ms

ipower_csscomponent.css

218 ms

87ae207201c55b84c5270851159260e1.1

466 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Secure.ipower.com, 49% (32 requests) were made to Ipower.com and 22% (14 requests) were made to Images.ipower.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (466 ms) relates to the external source Ipower.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.4 kB (45%)

Content Size

536.6 kB

After Optimization

293.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Secure.ipower.com main page is 536.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 240.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 29.3 kB
  • After minification 27.9 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 39.7 kB

  • Original 240.5 kB
  • After minification 200.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Secure IPOWER needs image optimization as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 107.7 kB

  • Original 174.2 kB
  • After minification 158.2 kB
  • After compression 66.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 74.9 kB

  • Original 92.6 kB
  • After minification 80.1 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Secure.ipower.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (48%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Secure IPOWER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

secure.ipower.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

secure.ipower.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

secure.ipower.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Secure.ipower.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Secure.ipower.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Secure IPOWER. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: