4.7 sec in total
961 ms
2.9 sec
783 ms
Visit archive.juliet-project.com now to see the best up-to-date Archive Juliet Project content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about archive.juliet-project.com
任天堂ゲームの感想と二次創作イラストサイト
Visit archive.juliet-project.comWe analyzed Archive.juliet-project.com page load time and found that the first response time was 961 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
archive.juliet-project.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value1,140 ms
22/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
961 ms
164 ms
320 ms
319 ms
322 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Archive.juliet-project.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (961 ms) belongs to the original domain Archive.juliet-project.com.
Page size can be reduced by 236.0 kB (34%)
698.6 kB
462.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Archive.juliet-project.com main page is 698.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 305.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 903 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Archive Juliet Project images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 104.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 104.8 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Archive.juliet-project.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (59%)
66
27
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Archive Juliet Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
archive.juliet-project.com
961 ms
style.css
164 ms
font-awesome.min.css
320 ms
style.css
319 ms
extension.css
322 ms
responsive-pc.css
341 ms
style.css
350 ms
responsive.css
359 ms
jquery.js
630 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
472 ms
adsbygoogle.js
11 ms
javascript.js
470 ms
javascript.js
505 ms
wp-embed.min.js
521 ms
style.css
563 ms
responsive.css
276 ms
media.css
159 ms
narrow.css
171 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
174 ms
0.gif
916 ms
0.gif
913 ms
imgrc0066891793.jpg
484 ms
0.gif
535 ms
41g3OgipfKL._SS160_.jpg
70 ms
0.gif
436 ms
0.gif
442 ms
0.gif
440 ms
0.gif
916 ms
0319_9.jpg
432 ms
0317_13.jpg
430 ms
0316_4.jpg
251 ms
0315_7-580x517.jpg
483 ms
0315_1.jpg
429 ms
0.gif
904 ms
0.gif
927 ms
0.gif
925 ms
0.gif
930 ms
51z-oPJtMjL._SS160_.jpg
135 ms
51W6BaP2GjL._SS160_.jpg
63 ms
61p42in6VSL._SS160_.jpg
61 ms
61oVNK4SOKL._SS140_.jpg
63 ms
51vcKRU2E8L._SS160_.jpg
62 ms
61k8ln9KX9L._SS160_.jpg
100 ms
612FD+Ka0VL._SS160_.jpg
130 ms
61v5L4egaXL._SS160_.jpg
132 ms
0.gif
631 ms
ga16021902d3.jpg
469 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
687 ms
ca-pub-1798261432074740.js
141 ms
zrt_lookup.html
127 ms
show_ads_impl.js
53 ms
dc.js
88 ms
ads
287 ms
osd.js
50 ms
__utm.gif
181 ms
sdk.js
275 ms
15629355753083210005
116 ms
abg.js
120 ms
m_js_controller.js
130 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
153 ms
s
52 ms
x_button_blue2.png
58 ms
113 ms
xd_arbiter.php
215 ms
xd_arbiter.php
423 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
4 ms
print.css
161 ms
ui
35 ms
archive.juliet-project.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
archive.juliet-project.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
archive.juliet-project.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Archive.juliet-project.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Archive.juliet-project.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
archive.juliet-project.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Archive Juliet Project. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: