Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

874 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

191 ms

jackcoxill.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jackcoxill.com now to see the best up-to-date Jackcoxill content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jackcoxill.com

Visit jackcoxill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jackcoxill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 874 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jackcoxill.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

jackcoxill.com

874 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

197 ms

jquery-ui.css

5 ms

wp-coreg-style.css

169 ms

dashicons.min.css

261 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Jackcoxill.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (874 ms) belongs to the original domain Jackcoxill.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 611.9 kB (73%)

Content Size

838.3 kB

After Optimization

226.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Jackcoxill.com main page is 838.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 486.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 11.8 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 510 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jackcoxill needs image optimization as it can save up to 510 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 214.1 kB

  • Original 336.7 kB
  • After minification 331.7 kB
  • After compression 122.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 388.9 kB

  • Original 486.0 kB
  • After minification 484.5 kB
  • After compression 97.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jackcoxill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 388.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (75%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jackcoxill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

jackcoxill.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jackcoxill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Jackcoxill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jackcoxill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: