Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

jameshughesblog.com

安全加密检测

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

422 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

131 ms

jameshughesblog.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jameshughesblog.com now to see the best up-to-date Jameshughesblog content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jameshughesblog.com

Reseller Hosting, Web Hosting, Dedicated Servers & Domain Names | Heart Internet

Visit jameshughesblog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jameshughesblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 422 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jameshughesblog.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

jameshughesblog.com

422 ms

styles.css

273 ms

show_ads.js

5 ms

logo.png

245 ms

btn_search.png

653 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jameshughesblog.com, 34% (10 requests) were made to Forwards.heartinternet.co.uk and 17% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (653 ms) relates to the external source Customer.heartinternet.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.5 kB (15%)

Content Size

120.4 kB

After Optimization

102.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Jameshughesblog.com main page is 120.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 87.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 7.6 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 87.4 kB
  • After minification 84.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jameshughesblog images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 149 B

  • Original 14.7 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 8.1 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jameshughesblog.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (41%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jameshughesblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

jameshughesblog.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jameshughesblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jameshughesblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jameshughesblog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: