Tools & Wizards About Us
jamesshiner.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

jamesshiner.com

Boston Web Design - Web Development | Yelling Mule

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

58 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

622 ms

jamesshiner.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jamesshiner.com now to see the best up-to-date Jamesshiner content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamesshiner.com

Yelling Mule is an award winning Boston web design company offering custom website solutions, SEO, strategic user interface design, marketing and branding.

Visit jamesshiner.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamesshiner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamesshiner.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,050 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamesshiner.com

58 ms

www.yellingmule.com

137 ms

style.min.css

77 ms

swiper.min.css

249 ms

style.css

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jamesshiner.com, 68% (63 requests) were made to Yellingmule.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (964 ms) relates to the external source Yellingmule.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 231.5 kB (25%)

Content Size

939.3 kB

After Optimization

707.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jamesshiner.com main page is 939.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 308.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 162.4 kB

  • Original 196.8 kB
  • After minification 186.6 kB
  • After compression 34.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 162.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 61.6 kB

  • Original 308.1 kB
  • After minification 246.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jamesshiner needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 270.6 kB
  • After minification 270.6 kB
  • After compression 268.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 163.9 kB
  • After minification 163.9 kB
  • After compression 158.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesshiner.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (60%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

33

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesshiner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamesshiner.com

jamesshiner.com

58 ms

www.yellingmule.com

www.yellingmule.com

137 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

77 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

249 ms

style.css

style.css

213 ms

buttons.min.css

buttons.min.css

191 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

221 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

189 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

190 ms

media-views.min.css

media-views.min.css

295 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

257 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

262 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

289 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

293 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

292 ms

style.css

style.css

297 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

393 ms

name_directory.css

name_directory.css

392 ms

jdl5noi.css

jdl5noi.css

163 ms

all.css

all.css

93 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

76 ms

slick.css

slick.css

353 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

393 ms

jquery.minicolors.css

jquery.minicolors.css

339 ms

style.css

style.css

345 ms

animations.css

animations.css

447 ms

media.css

media.css

446 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

469 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

455 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

100 ms

js

js

146 ms

js

js

192 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

603 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

441 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

603 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

681 ms

js

js

139 ms

jquery.minicolors.min.js

jquery.minicolors.min.js

682 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

682 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

74 ms

jquery.sitewide.js

jquery.sitewide.js

603 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

602 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

680 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

679 ms

react.min.js

react.min.js

680 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

144 ms

index.js

index.js

869 ms

p.css

p.css

31 ms

ga.js

ga.js

321 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

319 ms

47d5bbcca2608cee4f79582f4727f83c.png

47d5bbcca2608cee4f79582f4727f83c.png

619 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

375 ms

websites.svg

websites.svg

373 ms

branding-strategy-1.svg

branding-strategy-1.svg

376 ms

digital-marketing-1.svg

digital-marketing-1.svg

380 ms

maintenance-1.svg

maintenance-1.svg

378 ms

portfolio.svg

portfolio.svg

586 ms

testimonials.svg

testimonials.svg

583 ms

case-studies.svg

case-studies.svg

590 ms

blog.svg

blog.svg

588 ms

muleu.svg

muleu.svg

584 ms

glossary.svg

glossary.svg

581 ms

download.png

download.png

711 ms

mit-logo.png

mit-logo.png

712 ms

aim-logo.png

aim-logo.png

715 ms

webster-first-logo.png

webster-first-logo.png

941 ms

mass-general-logo.png

mass-general-logo.png

712 ms

wolf-logo-color.svg

wolf-logo-color.svg

712 ms

VanWagnerLogo.png

VanWagnerLogo.png

919 ms

curved-bg.png

curved-bg.png

923 ms

Asset-771.svg

Asset-771.svg

924 ms

wolf-logo-color.svg

wolf-logo-color.svg

932 ms

ReacHIRE_blue-solid-1.png

ReacHIRE_blue-solid-1.png

917 ms

OCB-Logo-191x102-1.png

OCB-Logo-191x102-1.png

963 ms

logo-black.svg

logo-black.svg

964 ms

bbb-a-rating-logo.png

bbb-a-rating-logo.png

907 ms

d

d

308 ms

d

d

374 ms

d

d

374 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

331 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

425 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

430 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

320 ms

400 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

362 ms

lftracker_v1_DzLR5a5oPn07BoQ2.js

lftracker_v1_DzLR5a5oPn07BoQ2.js

659 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

426 ms

collect

collect

60 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

58 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

259 ms

27 ms

tr.lfeeder.com

tr.lfeeder.com

69 ms

Accessibility Review

jamesshiner.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jamesshiner.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jamesshiner.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesshiner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jamesshiner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamesshiner.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jamesshiner. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: