Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

jboard.ru

JBoard.ru

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

672 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

569 ms

jboard.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit jboard.ru now to see the best up-to-date JBoard content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jboard.ru

Удобный сервис поиска работы Ростова и Ростовской области. Работа в Ростове и Ростовской области, вакансии Ростова и Ростовской области, база резюме соискателей из Ростова и Ростовской области

Visit jboard.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Jboard.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 672 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jboard.ru performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jboard.ru

672 ms

styles.css

140 ms

citieslist.php

2097 ms

jquery.js

404 ms

forms.js

414 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Jboard.ru, 11% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source O-ho.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 93.9 kB (50%)

Content Size

186.7 kB

After Optimization

92.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Jboard.ru main page is 186.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 112.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 28.9 kB

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 950 B

  • Original 23.4 kB
  • After minification 22.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JBoard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 53.5 kB

  • Original 112.1 kB
  • After minification 111.6 kB
  • After compression 58.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jboard.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (67%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JBoard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jboard.ru accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

jboard.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jboard.ru SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jboard.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Jboard.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JBoard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: