5.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
3 sec
431 ms
Click here to check amazing Jeffersonsantos content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jeffersonsantos.com
Visit jeffersonsantos.comWe analyzed Jeffersonsantos.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
jeffersonsantos.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value230 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
1636 ms
137 ms
136 ms
207 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Jeffersonsantos.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jeffersonsantos.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (59%)
2.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Jeffersonsantos.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jeffersonsantos images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 368.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jeffersonsantos.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 368.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (63%)
67
25
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jeffersonsantos. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jeffersonsantos.com
1636 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
137 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
136 ms
js_composer_front.css
207 ms
css
64 ms
styles.css
140 ms
default.css
138 ms
rgs.css
203 ms
font-awesome.min.css
226 ms
steadysets.css
209 ms
linecon.css
208 ms
style.css
387 ms
responsive.css
407 ms
player.min.js
282 ms
jquery.js
523 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
274 ms
powerpress-mejs.js
294 ms
modernizr.js
419 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
288 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
228 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
300 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
328 ms
jquery.ui.menu.min.js
338 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js
354 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
356 ms
public.min.js
371 ms
jquery.form.min.js
471 ms
scripts.js
471 ms
superfish.js
472 ms
respond.js
473 ms
sticky.js
473 ms
prettyPhoto.js
508 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
508 ms
isotope.min.js
510 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
631 ms
appear.js
509 ms
init.js
851 ms
nectar-slider.js
638 ms
comment-reply.min.js
547 ms
nectar-love.js
570 ms
js_composer_front.js
571 ms
moment.js
626 ms
langs.min.js
683 ms
logo-Blue-FINAL.png
267 ms
logo-Blue-FINAL-retina.png
384 ms
logo-BW-FINAL.png
324 ms
logo-BW-FINAL-retina.png
329 ms
ebook-279x300.png
615 ms
3-Ways-to-be-Happier.jpeg
612 ms
Are-you-productive-or-just-BUSY_.jpeg
611 ms
How-to-stop-comparing-yourself-to-other-people.jpeg
612 ms
BG-home.jpg
658 ms
book.png
671 ms
rss.png
613 ms
widgets.js
39 ms
fb-sprite.png
585 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
579 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
580 ms
Lovelo_Black.woff
580 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
811 ms
icomoon.woff
623 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
collect
14 ms
diagonal_line.png
71 ms
Slider21.jpg
171 ms
nectar-loading.gif
118 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
130 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
79 ms
jeffersonsantos.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jeffersonsantos.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jeffersonsantos.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jeffersonsantos.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jeffersonsantos.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jeffersonsantos.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jeffersonsantos. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: