Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

234 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

248 ms

jesseheap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jesseheap content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jesseheap.com

Supply sawgrass sublimation inks, fusing, laminating, and heat transfer printing machines, folders & attachments, winding and measuring machines and other labor saving devices.

Visit jesseheap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jesseheap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jesseheap.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jesseheap.com

234 ms

www.jesseheap.com

516 ms

main_page.css

74 ms

urchin.js

29 ms

__utm.gif

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Jesseheap.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (579 ms) belongs to the original domain Jesseheap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.6 kB (37%)

Content Size

82.2 kB

After Optimization

51.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Jesseheap.com main page is 82.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 41.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 22.6 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.6 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 41.8 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jesseheap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 971 B

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 11.0 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jesseheap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jesseheap. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

jesseheap.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jesseheap.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jesseheap.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jesseheap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Jesseheap.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jesseheap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: