5.3 sec in total
346 ms
4.6 sec
357 ms
Visit jetshop.no now to see the best up-to-date Jetshop content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jetshop.no
Visit jetshop.noWe analyzed Jetshop.no page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
jetshop.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value9.3 s
12/100
10%
Value1,830 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
346 ms
1201 ms
223 ms
215 ms
349 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Jetshop.no, 32% (22 requests) were made to Jetshop.co.uk and 4% (3 requests) were made to Vs5.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Jetshop.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 886.1 kB (45%)
2.0 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Jetshop.no main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 900.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jetshop needs image optimization as it can save up to 107.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 605.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 605.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jetshop.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (48%)
66
34
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jetshop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jetshop.no
346 ms
www.jetshop.no
1201 ms
language-selector.css
223 ms
zev3ngk.js
215 ms
3710644512.js
349 ms
vendors.min.css
229 ms
style.css
228 ms
modernizr.js
229 ms
language-selector-click.css
230 ms
styles.css
236 ms
cookie-banner.min.css
345 ms
TinyLightbox.css
335 ms
style.css
345 ms
jquery.js
449 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
335 ms
asset.js
544 ms
jquery.min.js
23 ms
owl.carousel.js
235 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
242 ms
bootstrap.min.js
283 ms
main.min.js
346 ms
language-selector.js
345 ms
jquery.form.min.js
348 ms
scripts.js
357 ms
cookie-banner.min.js
957 ms
sitepress.js
363 ms
css
23 ms
css
36 ms
main.min.css
179 ms
normalize.css
116 ms
default
395 ms
monitor.png
338 ms
fp-slider-johnells.jpg
331 ms
fp-slider-ica.jpg
333 ms
fp-slider-chiquelle.jpg
1451 ms
fp-slider-gatt.jpg
2402 ms
fp_slider_joy1.jpg
441 ms
fp_slider_sailracing1.jpg
445 ms
fp_slider_parksandresorts.jpg
456 ms
JOT-fbbanner.png
794 ms
Sk%C3%A4rmavbild-2014-05-12-kl.-14.08.35-e13998974622921.png
553 ms
Spottar_generation-x_nettbutikk-jetshop.png
775 ms
Spott_NO_Natsmart1.png
789 ms
utsolgt_sebc.jpg
880 ms
products_usp_commercesolutions.png
889 ms
products_usp_adaptdevelop.png
904 ms
products_usp_customerservice.png
909 ms
logo_footer.png
992 ms
logo_mini.png
116 ms
flag_icon_se.png
137 ms
flag_icon_no.png
137 ms
flag_icon_en.png
135 ms
flag_icon_rs.png
133 ms
logo_header.png
134 ms
loading1.gif
230 ms
wpspin_light-2x.gif
245 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
442 ms
arrows.simple.png
219 ms
people_usp.jpg
340 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
12 ms
bg_startpage151.jpg
632 ms
icons.png
83 ms
1458484945132
204 ms
ajax-loader-3.gif
18 ms
156 ms
35 ms
253 ms
v3
58 ms
jetshop.no accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
jetshop.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jetshop.no SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jetshop.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jetshop.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jetshop.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jetshop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: