14.9 sec in total
2.7 sec
11.3 sec
879 ms
Visit jetvan.org now to see the best up-to-date Jetvan content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jetvan.org
Buddhist Monastery
Visit jetvan.orgWe analyzed Jetvan.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 12.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
jetvan.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value18.0 s
0/100
10%
Value380 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.23
54/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
2706 ms
971 ms
676 ms
665 ms
966 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Jetvan.org, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jetvan.org.
Page size can be reduced by 760.5 kB (33%)
2.3 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Jetvan.org main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jetvan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 436.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 436.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 267.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jetvan.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 267.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (58%)
89
37
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jetvan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jetvan.org
2706 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
971 ms
styles.css
676 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
665 ms
settings.css
966 ms
css
27 ms
captions.php
902 ms
style.css
943 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1288 ms
owl.carousel.css
987 ms
owl.theme.css
1225 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
1283 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
1296 ms
responsive.css
1293 ms
images.css
1298 ms
style.css
1550 ms
style.php
1855 ms
css
34 ms
woocommerce.css
1598 ms
jquery.js
2197 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1625 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
2528 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2832 ms
custom.css
1908 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1683 ms
scripts.js
1903 ms
core.min.js
1946 ms
widget.min.js
2004 ms
mouse.min.js
2228 ms
sortable.min.js
2224 ms
tabs.min.js
2257 ms
accordion.min.js
2323 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2533 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
2872 ms
jquery.plugins.js
2869 ms
mfn.menu.js
2253 ms
scripts.js
2324 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2543 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2589 ms
base.css
2250 ms
animate.min.css
2623 ms
animations.css
2535 ms
buttons.css
2544 ms
fonts.css
2543 ms
isotope.css
2555 ms
grid.css
2824 ms
layout.css
2576 ms
shortcodes.css
2849 ms
variables.css
2547 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
2575 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
2585 ms
mfn-icons.css
623 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
313 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
317 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
329 ms
counter.php
353 ms
header_overlay.png
355 ms
jetvan_logo-1.png
354 ms
jetvan-banner1.jpg
1581 ms
7-150x150.jpg
367 ms
Am2nSC9QDrSHxwE0gBycnPDiLaTPOnuUcwRpKLJtc0PE-150x150.jpg
392 ms
DSC_0126-150x150.jpg
1272 ms
DSC_0121-150x150.jpg
668 ms
DSC_0278-150x150.jpg
1019 ms
img6-150x150.jpg
996 ms
20131111_075243_RichtoneHDR-e1454224518668-150x150.jpg
725 ms
AuMdf5YRmXRvU5MQ9GTsr1g0Tza525d-JAVpHR5yS6Lk-150x150.jpg
998 ms
AtyfxP3RomJJn8jkejc_OyyQ0c3ergYYZc_sAWTpvVwr-150x150.jpg
1059 ms
Atoikaypb1YaaPwTMfM1tCdmQ7OmKcJn5GF_XJGeBd2u-1-150x150.jpg
1329 ms
ArniBZV3e3PV35Ynm6eDjm4jMXIJFnNYzPQuaSWVJfUE-150x150.jpg
1322 ms
AoChmWGw2xyXDBHo8moIczMzjasJsaQ1tdq6wVa3l3j9-150x150.jpg
1353 ms
AnmKX5Q8dHDocb12KcpIG03MqC-gUa3RD-3A2hVjZgmL-150x150.jpg
1386 ms
AnIgF8QPOTP3ZDPrBxm7aYgQh09uqexVZzwvsB0s9sv_-150x150.jpg
1617 ms
1-150x150.jpg
1652 ms
DSC_0329-150x150.jpg
2269 ms
DSC_0328-150x150.jpg
2100 ms
DSC_0312-150x150.jpg
2434 ms
DSC_0288-150x150.jpg
1948 ms
DSC_0311-150x150.jpg
2573 ms
DSC_0286-150x150.jpg
2376 ms
DSC_0281-150x150.jpg
2295 ms
DSC_0060-150x150.jpg
2762 ms
DSC_0054-1-150x150.jpg
2900 ms
buddhabanner-2.jpg
2883 ms
Silver-Blur-Background-Wallpaper.jpg
3582 ms
footer.png
3064 ms
ico_search.png
2880 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
65 ms
_xyN3apAT_yRRDeqB3sPRg.woff
57 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
55 ms
kbP_6ONYVgE-bLa9ZRbvvvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
56 ms
mfn-icons.woff
3080 ms
timer.png
2897 ms
loader.gif
2886 ms
rev_slider_controls.png
2886 ms
jetvan.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jetvan.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jetvan.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jetvan.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jetvan.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jetvan.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jetvan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: