Tools & Wizards About Us
jfmwebdesign.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

jfmwebdesign.com

Santa Barbara Web Design | Local SEO | WordPress | Website Hosting

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

292 ms

Resources Loaded

956 ms

Page Rendered

104 ms

jfmwebdesign.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jfmwebdesign.com homepage info - get ready to check Jfm Web Design best content right away, or after learning these important things about jfmwebdesign.com

Santa Barbara Web Design, Social Media, Email Marketing & More. Get Inspired & Take Action

Visit jfmwebdesign.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jfmwebdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 292 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jfmwebdesign.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jfmwebdesign.com

292 ms

www.jfmwebdesign.com

209 ms

style.css

15 ms

fonts.css

26 ms

css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Jfmwebdesign.com, 47% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.bunny.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (292 ms) belongs to the original domain Jfmwebdesign.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

142.9 kB

After Optimization

131.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jfmwebdesign.com main page is 142.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 86.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 6.0 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 86.7 kB
  • After minification 80.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jfm Web Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 196 B

  • Original 36.2 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB
  • After compression 36.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 563 B

  • Original 13.9 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jfmwebdesign.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jfm Web Design. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

jfmwebdesign.com

jfmwebdesign.com

292 ms

www.jfmwebdesign.com

www.jfmwebdesign.com

209 ms

style.css

style.css

15 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

26 ms

css

css

21 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

193 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

211 ms

jquery.frontend.js

jquery.frontend.js

30 ms

JFMwd-Logo-600pxW.png

JFMwd-Logo-600pxW.png

214 ms

Code-BG-2020.png

Code-BG-2020.png

258 ms

open-sans-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

open-sans-cyrillic-ext-400-normal.woff

15 ms

open-sans-vietnamese-400-normal.woff

open-sans-vietnamese-400-normal.woff

7 ms

open-sans-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

open-sans-latin-ext-400-normal.woff

7 ms

open-sans-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

open-sans-greek-ext-400-normal.woff

12 ms

open-sans-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

open-sans-cyrillic-400-normal.woff

9 ms

open-sans-hebrew-400-normal.woff

open-sans-hebrew-400-normal.woff

12 ms

open-sans-latin-400-normal.woff

open-sans-latin-400-normal.woff

12 ms

open-sans-greek-400-normal.woff

open-sans-greek-400-normal.woff

13 ms

foundation-icons.woff

foundation-icons.woff

169 ms

Accessibility Review

jfmwebdesign.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jfmwebdesign.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jfmwebdesign.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jfmwebdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jfmwebdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jfmwebdesign.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jfm Web Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: