2.4 sec in total
198 ms
2.1 sec
178 ms
Welcome to jheberg.net homepage info - get ready to check Jheberg best content for Morocco right away, or after learning these important things about jheberg.net
Uploadez vos fichiers chez le leader de l'hébergement MultiUpload.
Visit jheberg.netWe analyzed Jheberg.net page load time and found that the first response time was 198 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
jheberg.net performance score
198 ms
274 ms
12 ms
857 ms
778 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jheberg.net, 86% (51 requests) were made to Cdn.jheberg.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.jheberg.net.
Page size can be reduced by 994.1 kB (77%)
1.3 MB
297.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Jheberg.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 813.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jheberg needs image optimization as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 665.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 665.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jheberg.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (40%)
53
32
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jheberg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jheberg.net
198 ms
www.jheberg.net
274 ms
font-awesome.css
12 ms
bootstrap.min.css
857 ms
style.css
778 ms
global.css
698 ms
hint.css
634 ms
jnotify.css
646 ms
slick.css
647 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.css
718 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui-noscript.css
736 ms
jquery.min.js
1017 ms
slick.min.js
782 ms
bootstrap.min.js
886 ms
jnotify.js
825 ms
utils.js
872 ms
jquery.ui.js
1250 ms
tmpl.min.js
923 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
928 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
1008 ms
jquery.fileupload-fp.js
970 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.js
1129 ms
main.js
1006 ms
reset.css
287 ms
ga.js
67 ms
logo.png
89 ms
fr.png
94 ms
us.png
80 ms
upload-bg.png
80 ms
main-button.png
111 ms
hostLight.png
192 ms
uploaded.png
193 ms
uptobox.png
208 ms
1fichier.png
209 ms
2shared.png
208 ms
filecloud.png
237 ms
filerio.png
240 ms
mediafire.png
241 ms
mega.png
256 ms
rapidgator.png
278 ms
turboit.png
293 ms
free.png
315 ms
hugefiles_idx.png
318 ms
uplea-index.png
319 ms
oboom-index.png
342 ms
nitroflare-index.png
370 ms
jeodrive-index.png
384 ms
facebook-block.png
392 ms
debrideurs.png
393 ms
remote.png
394 ms
separator.png
426 ms
api.png
462 ms
uploader.png
479 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
16 ms
SourceSansPro-Light.otf
432 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
29 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
41 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
fond_check.png
275 ms
jheberg.net SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jheberg.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jheberg.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jheberg.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jheberg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: