24.5 sec in total
3.3 sec
20.8 sec
410 ms
Visit jj88.com now to see the best up-to-date Jj 88 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jj88.com
jj88.com
Visit jj88.comWe analyzed Jj88.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 21.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
jj88.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value480 ms
60/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.4 s
15/100
10%
3265 ms
1202 ms
793 ms
8 ms
6264 ms
Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Jj88.com, 7% (9 requests) were made to Cpro.baidustatic.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Pos.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Jj88.com.
Page size can be reduced by 370.8 kB (46%)
802.4 kB
431.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Jj88.com main page is 802.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 441.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jj 88 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 276.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 276.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jj88.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (46%)
118
64
The browser has sent 118 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jj 88. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jj88.com
3265 ms
style.css
1202 ms
Switching.js
793 ms
show_ads.js
8 ms
c.js
6264 ms
style.css
808 ms
siteTop.jpg
788 ms
inputBg2.gif
803 ms
loginBtn.gif
1422 ms
iconTop.gif
1172 ms
logo.gif
3920 ms
read_commend.gif
1662 ms
ca-pub-1535531375190385.js
71 ms
zrt_lookup.html
142 ms
show_ads_impl.js
86 ms
inf.js
289 ms
more.gif
1383 ms
kantu.gif
2322 ms
215329134960.jpg
3210 ms
_21295D27.gif
2231 ms
ads
253 ms
osd.js
8 ms
gaoshoujj.gif
2203 ms
050640135N0.gif
2686 ms
jibenfenxi.gif
2871 ms
1P41G2110.jpg
4400 ms
_193GWN.gif
4244 ms
_1945524N.gif
5135 ms
_194U2317.gif
5112 ms
_195153145.gif
5966 ms
_19594B58.gif
5439 ms
zb01.gif
5060 ms
zb02.gif
5284 ms
zb03.gif
5479 ms
zb04.gif
6387 ms
zb05.gif
7418 ms
zb06.gif
5691 ms
css
54 ms
m_js_controller.js
31 ms
abg.js
36 ms
nessie_icon_magazine_black.png
35 ms
s
21 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
24 ms
nessie_icon_magazine_white.png
15 ms
x_button_blue2.png
18 ms
j6SDDiQit5YY48GNgPpnCluJgoNCzbKlh5o6eVjReZI.js
6 ms
PuwvqkdbcqU-fCZ9Ed-b7S3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
58 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
64 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
69 ms
stat.php
1084 ms
f.js
5434 ms
vdimgck.php
5919 ms
activeview
14 ms
bcam
858 ms
partBgL.gif
619 ms
partBgL_t.gif
864 ms
ads
255 ms
ads
209 ms
ads
227 ms
bdun.bsc
2526 ms
partBgR.gif
966 ms
partBgR_t.gif
1540 ms
partBgR_span.gif
1239 ms
dotline.gif
1385 ms
unfcn_mj_01.gif
1503 ms
style2092.jsp
310 ms
bg_lanmu.gif
1666 ms
bcam
859 ms
main.js
41 ms
style2843.jsp
262 ms
style2900.jsp
254 ms
partBgR_span2.gif
5431 ms
stat.htm
249 ms
core.php
1300 ms
ex
1225 ms
ffffff_new_ico.gif
7 ms
2536892860981915376
30 ms
bcam
1822 ms
bcam
3070 ms
activeview
35 ms
tanxssp.js
311 ms
9.gif
777 ms
pic.gif
1298 ms
bcam
845 ms
cpro.js
739 ms
adx.php
874 ms
ex
1820 ms
icon_12px.png
495 ms
app.gif
841 ms
bcam
2711 ms
xuanfu_close.png
551 ms
adx.php
440 ms
tencent
886 ms
fyb_26.js
520 ms
reduce_bd-logo1_oper.png
501 ms
unlogo01.gif
1816 ms
closefeedback.min.js
267 ms
acbeacon2.html
810 ms
spf
4008 ms
TB1DmcoJXXXXXavXpXXXXXXXXXX-26-26.png
102 ms
TB1hC54FVXXXXccXpXXO04pFXXX.html
1052 ms
TB1Lt7aJXXXXXcjXVXXXXXXXXXX-117-26.png
97 ms
TB1rRQpJXXXXXcvXXXXXXXXXXXX-40-26.png
100 ms
TB1upAiJXXXXXa5aXXXXXXXXXXX-116-30.png
101 ms
reduce_promotion_oper.png
2165 ms
bd_logo.png
1965 ms
bg_rb.png
2660 ms
adx.php
449 ms
u=1761949105,2040646173&fm=76
3835 ms
u=891996509,1068888552&fm=76
2442 ms
u=827521401,1164323166&fm=76
5800 ms
bg.png
501 ms
u=853365190,4230191246&fm=76
1861 ms
u=1914141967,2221064507&fm=76
1723 ms
u=154998079,4178392996&fm=76
5480 ms
u=3946572452,4091640842&fm=76
3479 ms
t.gif
1003 ms
app.gif
1001 ms
um.js
387 ms
img
1211 ms
um.json
2774 ms
getDeviceInfo
1119 ms
getDeviceInfo
1013 ms
o.htm
460 ms
ui
44 ms
wh.js
1690 ms
ac.js
1501 ms
fp.htm
679 ms
jj88.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jj88.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jj88.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
ZH
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jj88.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that Jj88.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
jj88.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jj 88. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: