Tools & Wizards About Us
joefair.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

joefair.com

Home

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

238 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

221 ms

joefair.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Joefair content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about joefair.com

Merry Christmas And Happy Holidays To Our Non-Christian Friends. Donald Trumps Dreaming Of A White XMAS

Visit joefair.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joefair.com page load time and found that the first response time was 238 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joefair.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.2 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,980 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.029

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.joefair.com

238 ms

font_styles_ns4.css

86 ms

font_styles.css

330 ms

ExternalRedirect.dll

45 ms

Dead_Head_Joe2.gif

238 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Joefair.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to Homestead.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to T8.prnx.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) relates to the external source Homestead.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.2 kB (63%)

Content Size

112.9 kB

After Optimization

41.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Joefair.com main page is 112.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 97.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 62.7 kB

  • Original 97.6 kB
  • After minification 97.2 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 9.5 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joefair.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (33%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joefair. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.joefair.com

www.joefair.com

238 ms

font_styles_ns4.css

font_styles_ns4.css

86 ms

font_styles.css

font_styles.css

330 ms

ExternalRedirect.dll

ExternalRedirect.dll

45 ms

Dead_Head_Joe2.gif

Dead_Head_Joe2.gif

238 ms

Shapes.dll

Shapes.dll

123 ms

Shapes.dll

Shapes.dll

86 ms

site_statistics.ffhtml

site_statistics.ffhtml

46 ms

ibc90006.js

ibc90006.js

206 ms

tc.js

tc.js

130 ms

prnx_track.js

prnx_track.js

44 ms

jQuery-1.6.3.min.js

jQuery-1.6.3.min.js

84 ms

jquery.cookie.min.js

jquery.cookie.min.js

45 ms

t.asp

t.asp

311 ms

Accessibility Review

joefair.com accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

joefair.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

joefair.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joefair.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Joefair.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

joefair.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joefair. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: