Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

joompolitan.com

WordPress vs. Joomla: which is better? - EasyWP

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

928 ms

Page Rendered

564 ms

joompolitan.com screenshot

About Website

Visit joompolitan.com now to see the best up-to-date Joompolitan content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joompolitan.com

And that’s what we’re here to discuss; the pros and cons of WordPress vs. Joomla so you can decide which one is better for your next website.

Visit joompolitan.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joompolitan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joompolitan.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.097

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joompolitan.com

187 ms

style.css

149 ms

reset.css

75 ms

text.css

149 ms

ga.js

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Joompolitan.com, 12% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (416 ms) belongs to the original domain Joompolitan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

299.4 kB

After Optimization

277.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Joompolitan.com main page is 299.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 263.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 12.2 kB
  • After minification 11.3 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 263.6 kB
  • After minification 255.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joompolitan images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 6.4 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joompolitan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joompolitan. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

joompolitan.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

joompolitan.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

joompolitan.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joompolitan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Joompolitan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joompolitan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: