Tools & Wizards About Us
joplink.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

joplink.net

Cusabio Europe, UK & US Distribution | Gentaur & Genprice Supply

Page Load Speed

9.5 sec in total

First Response

315 ms

Resources Loaded

8 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

joplink.net screenshot

About Website

Visit joplink.net now to see the best up-to-date Joplink content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about joplink.net

Cusabio Europe, UK & US Distribution with Gentaur & Genprice. Elisa, Antibodies & Recombinants

Visit joplink.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Joplink.net page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joplink.net performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value13,940 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.452

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joplink.net

315 ms

joplink.net

583 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

403 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

363 ms

webfont.js

294 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Joplink.net, 53% (25 requests) were made to Cdn11.bigcommerce.com and 17% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn11.bigcommerce.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 951.0 kB (21%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Joplink.net main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 406.3 kB

  • Original 485.9 kB
  • After minification 438.9 kB
  • After compression 79.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 406.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 210.2 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Joplink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 57.3 kB
  • After compression 32.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 309.8 kB

  • Original 366.7 kB
  • After minification 366.5 kB
  • After compression 56.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joplink.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 309.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (43%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joplink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

joplink.net

joplink.net

315 ms

joplink.net

joplink.net

583 ms

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

theme-bundle.polyfills.js

403 ms

theme-bundle.head_async.js

theme-bundle.head_async.js

363 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

294 ms

css

css

362 ms

theme-16a7b390-b50a-013a-7750-0e7aeb9bc8ac.css

theme-16a7b390-b50a-013a-7750-0e7aeb9bc8ac.css

849 ms

js

js

399 ms

consent-manager-config-d6e68e7aa99bb19574354ddd229c2b6e31338b2d.js

consent-manager-config-d6e68e7aa99bb19574354ddd229c2b6e31338b2d.js

391 ms

consent-manager-dc12603eeb4f9f939f028e1be9d15cdba28d08ca.js

consent-manager-dc12603eeb4f9f939f028e1be9d15cdba28d08ca.js

393 ms

theme-bundle.main.js

theme-bundle.main.js

332 ms

theme-bundle.chunk.vendors.js

theme-bundle.chunk.vendors.js

279 ms

csrf-protection-header-b572e5526f6854c73a5e080ef15a771f963740ae.js

csrf-protection-header-b572e5526f6854c73a5e080ef15a771f963740ae.js

279 ms

Ywn3Nsnvh4E

Ywn3Nsnvh4E

1711 ms

rsz_1joplink_1652393304__40261.original.png

rsz_1joplink_1652393304__40261.original.png

1485 ms

cusabio-2-current-view.png

cusabio-2-current-view.png

1488 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__77890.1641908120.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__77890.1641908120.jpg

1485 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__89428.1641908111.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__89428.1641908111.jpg

1485 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__73115.1641908099.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__73115.1641908099.jpg

1486 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__93421.1641908054.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__85480.1638383402__93421.1641908054.jpg

1484 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

1487 ms

emthemesmodezicons.ttf

emthemesmodezicons.ttf

225 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

423 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

1620 ms

base.js

base.js

1710 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

1584 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

1637 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2099 ms

theme-bundle.chunk.12.js

theme-bundle.chunk.12.js

1201 ms

search.php

search.php

1128 ms

icon-sprite.svg

icon-sprite.svg

825 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

860 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

958 ms

categories.php

categories.php

932 ms

categories.php

categories.php

1625 ms

500x80

500x80

920 ms

cusabio-25-tests-trial-banner.png

cusabio-25-tests-trial-banner.png

1097 ms

1920x250

1920x250

918 ms

id

id

793 ms

mRkKEWnL-xyN5Za0N8xt01fqaN4W9u1e2Pe6j7YVmu8.js

mRkKEWnL-xyN5Za0N8xt01fqaN4W9u1e2Pe6j7YVmu8.js

665 ms

embed.js

embed.js

114 ms

loading.svg

loading.svg

129 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__98391.1638885082__76508.1639691941.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__98391.1638885082__76508.1639691941.jpg

470 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__98391.1638885082__37080.1639691938.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__98391.1638885082__37080.1639691938.jpg

139 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__42582.1638886775.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__42582.1638886775.jpg

467 ms

cusabio__81676.1638370075__23719.1638886774.jpg

cusabio__81676.1638370075__23719.1638886774.jpg

468 ms

Create

Create

338 ms

Accessibility Review

joplink.net accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

joplink.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

joplink.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joplink.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Joplink.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

joplink.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Joplink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: