Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

josafety.com

JO Safety A/S | Sikkerhedsskilte | Opmærkning & Afspærring | Sikkerhedsprodukter

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

336 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

447 ms

josafety.com screenshot

About Website

Visit josafety.com now to see the best up-to-date JO Safety content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about josafety.com

Alt i sikkerhedsskilte, sikkerhedsmærkning og sikkerhedsprodukter til det skandinaviske marked. JO Safety A/S leverandør til en sikker arbejdsplads!

Visit josafety.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Josafety.com page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

josafety.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.691

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

josafety.com

336 ms

www.josafety.dk

315 ms

frontpage.html

450 ms

webshop.min.css

206 ms

shop-135.css

281 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Josafety.com, 85% (50 requests) were made to Josafety.dk and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (940 ms) relates to the external source Josafety.dk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 704.5 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Josafety.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 41.6 kB

  • Original 50.3 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 98.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 929.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JO Safety images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 398.5 kB

  • Original 566.8 kB
  • After minification 540.7 kB
  • After compression 168.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 166.0 kB

  • Original 199.3 kB
  • After minification 189.0 kB
  • After compression 33.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Josafety.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (34%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JO Safety. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

josafety.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

josafety.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

josafety.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Josafety.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Danish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Josafety.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JO Safety. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: