19.5 sec in total
505 ms
18.9 sec
151 ms
Visit journaleditors.com now to see the best up-to-date Journal Editors content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about journaleditors.com
افزایش شانس پذیرش مقاله های علمی - ترجمه و ویرایش تخصصی مقالات شما توسط یک کارشناس ارشد جهت انتشار در مجلات علمی معتبر
Visit journaleditors.comWe analyzed Journaleditors.com page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 19 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
journaleditors.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value460 ms
62/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
505 ms
448 ms
16309 ms
25 ms
400 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Journaleditors.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Journaleditors.com.
Page size can be reduced by 451.8 kB (58%)
776.7 kB
324.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Journaleditors.com main page is 776.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 276.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Journal Editors needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 186.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 197.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journaleditors.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 197.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (66%)
53
18
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journal Editors. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
journaleditors.com
505 ms
fa
448 ms
16309 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
400 ms
style.css
213 ms
responsive.css
392 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
318 ms
jquery.onebyone.css
420 ms
prettyPhoto.css
254 ms
styles.css
319 ms
styles-rtl.css
347 ms
style.css
504 ms
default-rtl.min.css
536 ms
jquery.id.moover-1.7.5.css
485 ms
jquery.js
773 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
603 ms
jquery.onebyone.min.js
556 ms
jquery.bxSlider.min.js
697 ms
jquery.simpleFAQ-0.7.min.js
685 ms
jquery.faq.js
697 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
666 ms
jquery.blackandwhite.min.js
620 ms
js_func.js
688 ms
comment-reply.min.js
845 ms
jquery.form.min.js
807 ms
scripts.js
806 ms
wp-embed.min.js
847 ms
jquery.validationEngine-fa.js
975 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
977 ms
front-subscribers.js
906 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
554 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
41 ms
JE_LOGO.png
345 ms
sprite.png
183 ms
home1_slide_1.png
388 ms
home7_slide_2.png
512 ms
home7_slide_3.png
512 ms
home7_slide_4.png
554 ms
text_bar.png
353 ms
arrow.gif
467 ms
arrow.png
497 ms
shadow.png
500 ms
larg_icon_editing.png
563 ms
larg_icon_translation.png
583 ms
larg_icon_peer-review.png
585 ms
larg_icon_formatting.png
601 ms
larg_icon_figure.png
613 ms
social_shadow.png
742 ms
social_bg.png
730 ms
white_dot.png
732 ms
BYekan.woff
698 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
6 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
36 ms
BTitrBold.woff
700 ms
moover_shadow.png
386 ms
circlebutton.png
529 ms
prev.png
523 ms
next.png
527 ms
journaleditors.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
journaleditors.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
journaleditors.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FA
FA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journaleditors.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Journaleditors.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
journaleditors.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Journal Editors. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: