4.8 sec in total
989 ms
3.6 sec
213 ms
Click here to check amazing Js content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about js.com
Pakistan Financial Services
Visit js.comWe analyzed Js.com page load time and found that the first response time was 989 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Js.com rating and web reputation
js.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.3 s
41/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.296
40/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
989 ms
37 ms
56 ms
90 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Js.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (989 ms) belongs to the original domain Js.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (53%)
2.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Js.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Js needs image optimization as it can save up to 145.1 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 758.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 758.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Js.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (59%)
58
24
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Js. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.js.com
989 ms
bootstrap.min.css
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
56 ms
jquery.min.js
90 ms
bootstrap.min.js
47 ms
api.js
64 ms
jquery.min.js
118 ms
style.css
152 ms
responsive.css
145 ms
meanmenu.css
150 ms
responsive-slider.css
146 ms
prettyPhoto.css
170 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
171 ms
styles.css
221 ms
light_style.css
221 ms
roktabs.css
221 ms
mootools.js
424 ms
jquery.js
359 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
239 ms
superb-slideshow.js
279 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
285 ms
video-lightbox.js
283 ms
roktabs.js
304 ms
jquery.tabify.js
343 ms
jquery.meanmenu.js
349 ms
addthis_widget.js
45 ms
output.css
350 ms
responsive-slider.js
367 ms
comment-reply.min.js
405 ms
jquery.form.min.js
411 ms
scripts.js
412 ms
collapse.js
497 ms
wp-embed.min.js
496 ms
recaptcha__en.js
106 ms
ga.js
44 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
338 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
icon-search.png
211 ms
bg.jpg
202 ms
logo.png
201 ms
menu-hover.jpg
203 ms
mainmenu-sub-bg.png
202 ms
banner112-1440x361.jpg
217 ms
banner1234-1440x361.jpg
218 ms
banner1542-1440x361.jpg
252 ms
banner1408-1440x361.jpg
204 ms
slider-pagination-bg.jpg
202 ms
js-4.jpg
266 ms
mahvish_jahangir_foundation.jpg
216 ms
js-2.jpg
271 ms
js-1-1.jpg
337 ms
Announement-button.jpg
283 ms
JamaPunji-Logo.png
528 ms
Untitled.jpg
316 ms
new.gif
331 ms
footer-bg.jpg
340 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
21 ms
300lo.json
30 ms
slider-pagination-active.jpg
69 ms
slider-nav.png
70 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
17 ms
js.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
js.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
js.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Js.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Js.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
js.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Js. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: