5 sec in total
440 ms
4.4 sec
134 ms
Click here to check amazing Jsnippet content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jsnippet.net
Online Editor for JavaScript, CSS, HTML. Build and test amazing web snippets - Prototype, Showcase your work.
Visit jsnippet.netWe analyzed Jsnippet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 440 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
jsnippet.net performance score
440 ms
1409 ms
72 ms
133 ms
271 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Jsnippet.net, 6% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Jsnippet.net.
Page size can be reduced by 942.0 kB (76%)
1.2 MB
302.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Jsnippet.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 926.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jsnippet needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 698.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 698.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jsnippet.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (76%)
72
17
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jsnippet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jsnippet.net
440 ms
www.jsnippet.net
1409 ms
css
72 ms
animate+animo.css
133 ms
codemirror.css
271 ms
show-hint.css
426 ms
dialog.css
420 ms
matchesonscrollbar.css
417 ms
font-awesome.css
420 ms
colorpicker.css
424 ms
prism.css
423 ms
modal.css
550 ms
basic.css
934 ms
modernizr.js
547 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
720 ms
animating-color.js
584 ms
codemirror.js
985 ms
rulers-shlomi.js
676 ms
show-hint-shlomi.js
1176 ms
placeholder-shlomi.js
713 ms
matchbrackets.js
806 ms
xml-fold.js
843 ms
matchtags.js
848 ms
javascript-hint-shlomi.js
968 ms
xml-hint-shlomi.js
972 ms
html-hint-shlomi.js
977 ms
css-hint-shlomi.js
1060 ms
xml.js
1063 ms
javascript.js
1101 ms
htmlmixed.js
1105 ms
search.js
1112 ms
searchcursor.js
1189 ms
dialog.js
1192 ms
annotatescrollbar.js
1230 ms
matchesonscrollbar.js
1242 ms
css.js
1250 ms
platform.js
75 ms
animo.min.js
1298 ms
jquery.sparkline.min.js
1323 ms
api.js
59 ms
parseUrl.js
1321 ms
colorpicker.js
1237 ms
dpNumberPicker-2.x.js
1124 ms
prism.js
972 ms
iid.js
1146 ms
modal.js
1042 ms
base.js
1042 ms
keyapi.js
1089 ms
in_page.js
1095 ms
in_page_not_loged.js
975 ms
in_page_not_loaded.js
1043 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
btn_donate_SM.gif
156 ms
pixel.gif
244 ms
sdk.js
473 ms
mob_bg.png
383 ms
cmL3SAAAA
1 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
598 ms
collect
38 ms
collect
56 ms
piwik.js
141 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
16 ms
recaptcha__en.js
49 ms
iframe
76 ms
2172305219-idpiframe.js
23 ms
95 ms
xd_arbiter.php
455 ms
iframerpc
42 ms
fallback
28 ms
fallback
39 ms
fallback__ltr.css
4 ms
payload
24 ms
css
15 ms
payload
15 ms
logo_48.png
6 ms
refresh.png
4 ms
audio.png
6 ms
jsnippet.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jsnippet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Jsnippet.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jsnippet.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jsnippet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: