Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

jsonbeautifier.org

Json Beautifier - Json Formatter | Json Viewer | Json Editor

Page Load Speed

718 ms in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

510 ms

Page Rendered

168 ms

jsonbeautifier.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jsonbeautifier.org homepage info - get ready to check Json Beautifier best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about jsonbeautifier.org

Online best free JSON Beautifier tool used as JSON editor, Json viewer, Json Validator and Json formatter to display data in a tree view and plain text.

Visit jsonbeautifier.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Jsonbeautifier.org page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 678 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jsonbeautifier.org performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.38

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jsonbeautifier.org

40 ms

gtm.js

69 ms

bootstrap.min.css

23 ms

jdd.css

45 ms

jsoneditor.min.css

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Jsonbeautifier.org, 11% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (287 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

704.3 kB

After Optimization

655.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Jsonbeautifier.org main page is 704.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 600.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 48.0 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 63.7 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 350 B

  • Original 7.0 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Json Beautifier images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 217 B

  • Original 600.5 kB
  • After minification 600.5 kB
  • After compression 600.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 240 B

  • Original 33.1 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 32.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jsonbeautifier.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (67%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Json Beautifier. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jsonbeautifier.org accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jsonbeautifier.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

jsonbeautifier.org SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jsonbeautifier.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jsonbeautifier.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Json Beautifier. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: