2.4 sec in total
496 ms
1.7 sec
129 ms
Click here to check amazing JSONPath content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jsonpath.com
An online playground for JSONPath
Visit jsonpath.comWe analyzed Jsonpath.com page load time and found that the first response time was 496 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
jsonpath.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
92/100
10%
Value1.8 s
98/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value890 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.127
82/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
496 ms
497 ms
962 ms
15 ms
665 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Jsonpath.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to D7x5nblzs94me.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) relates to the external source B.st-hatena.com.
Page size can be reduced by 559.0 kB (70%)
796.7 kB
237.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Jsonpath.com main page is 796.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 629.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, JSONPath needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 431.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 431.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 97.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jsonpath.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 97.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (67%)
36
12
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JSONPath. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jsonpath.com
496 ms
cd5c8df3.main.css
497 ms
bookmark_button.js
962 ms
pinit.js
15 ms
55b52d6b.vendor.js
665 ms
ace.js
29 ms
dc6c2997.main.js
211 ms
sdk.js
24 ms
68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f6769746875622f726962626f6e732f666f726b6d655f72696768745f6461726b626c75655f3132313632312e706e67
93 ms
pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
19 ms
button-only@2x.png
641 ms
widgets.js
282 ms
btn.js
110 ms
312 ms
xd_arbiter.php
43 ms
xd_arbiter.php
65 ms
pinit_main.js
34 ms
analytics.js
111 ms
theme-solarized_dark.js
81 ms
mode-json.js
112 ms
button
57 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
133 ms
button.css
66 ms
shared.js
66 ms
button.js
73 ms
collect
26 ms
like.php
113 ms
pocket_button.png
8 ms
worker-json.js
40 ms
227 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
56 ms
wy1X4hBW7e7.js
69 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
50 ms
jot
91 ms
reset.css
7 ms
entry-button.css
8 ms
bbtn-l_v3.png
3 ms
jsonpath.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
jsonpath.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jsonpath.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jsonpath.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jsonpath.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jsonpath.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JSONPath. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: