Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

julianadesign.ru

Подборка Marketplace-площадок by LegalRC

Page Load Speed

40.8 sec in total

First Response

8.2 sec

Resources Loaded

32 sec

Page Rendered

603 ms

julianadesign.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Julianadesign content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about julianadesign.ru

Дизайн в социальных сетях и продающая графика....Приветствую Вас! ..Сегодня речь пойдет о графике в социальных сетях..В статье не будет каких-либо уроков на тему "трюки в фотошопе". Нет. Я просто объя...

Visit julianadesign.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Julianadesign.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 8.2 sec and then it took 32.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 20 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

julianadesign.ru performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

julianadesign.ru

8172 ms

style.css

2197 ms

styles.css

458 ms

fancybox.css

3938 ms

jquery.lightbox-0.5.css

985 ms

Our browser made a total of 122 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Julianadesign.ru, 10% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20 sec) relates to the external source Connect.ok.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 536.4 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

852.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Julianadesign.ru main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 788.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 58.8 kB
  • After minification 56.9 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 96.3 kB

  • Original 788.3 kB
  • After minification 691.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Julianadesign needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 305.9 kB

  • Original 432.3 kB
  • After minification 332.1 kB
  • After compression 126.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 305.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 89.6 kB

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 91.7 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julianadesign.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (64%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julianadesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

julianadesign.ru accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

julianadesign.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

julianadesign.ru SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julianadesign.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julianadesign.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Julianadesign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: