Tools & Wizards About Us
julietvanheerden.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

julietvanheerden.com

Juliet Van Heerden: Same Dress, Different Day | Sowing Hope in Hearts Wounded by Addiction

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

619 ms

Page Rendered

498 ms

julietvanheerden.com screenshot

About Website

Visit julietvanheerden.com now to see the best up-to-date Juliet Van Heerden content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about julietvanheerden.com

For as long as I can remember, I've been journaling my journey with God. Mostly, I allow Him to navigate. Occasionally, I take matters into my own hands, ending up in the ditch. Whether in the di...

Visit julietvanheerden.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Julietvanheerden.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julietvanheerden.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

46/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

76/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

julietvanheerden.com

11 ms

julietvanheerden.com

377 ms

style.css

43 ms

79 ms

dashicons.min.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Julietvanheerden.com, 16% (4 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) belongs to the original domain Julietvanheerden.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.4 kB (13%)

Content Size

645.8 kB

After Optimization

562.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Julietvanheerden.com main page is 645.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 408.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 78.9 kB

  • Original 97.5 kB
  • After minification 95.2 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 16 B

  • Original 408.6 kB
  • After minification 408.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Juliet Van Heerden images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 932 B

  • Original 91.7 kB
  • After minification 91.7 kB
  • After compression 90.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 48.0 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 44.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julietvanheerden.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (48%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Juliet Van Heerden. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

julietvanheerden.com

julietvanheerden.com

11 ms

julietvanheerden.com

julietvanheerden.com

377 ms

style.css

style.css

43 ms

79 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

52 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

22 ms

72 ms

72 ms

e-202408.js

e-202408.js

22 ms

74 ms

view.js

view.js

142 ms

sharing.min.js

sharing.min.js

144 ms

fb.jpg

fb.jpg

127 ms

website-header-final.jpg

website-header-final.jpg

105 ms

book-cover-02.jpg

book-cover-02.jpg

105 ms

same-dress-cover-june-2015.jpg

same-dress-cover-june-2015.jpg

94 ms

rls-logo.png

rls-logo.png

146 ms

search.png

search.png

37 ms

book-cover-02.jpg

book-cover-02.jpg

48 ms

same-dress-cover-june-2015.jpg

same-dress-cover-june-2015.jpg

39 ms

master.html

master.html

26 ms

count.json

count.json

32 ms

g.gif

g.gif

26 ms

rlt-proxy.js

rlt-proxy.js

2 ms

4 ms

Accessibility Review

julietvanheerden.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

julietvanheerden.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

julietvanheerden.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julietvanheerden.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julietvanheerden.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

julietvanheerden.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Juliet Van Heerden. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: