Tools & Wizards About Us
jullian.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

jullian.net

French easels and accessories for outdoor painting | JULLIAN Paris

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

252 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

524 ms

jullian.net screenshot

About Website

Visit jullian.net now to see the best up-to-date JULLIAN content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jullian.net

From 1948, we design and produce our easels and accessories for outdoor painting with the aim of giving full satisfaction to the artists. Visit us!

Visit jullian.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Jullian.net page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jullian.net performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.303

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jullian.net

252 ms

659 ms

gtm.js

70 ms

vendors.min.css

205 ms

style.min.css

755 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Jullian.net, 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jullian.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 128.5 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jullian.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 770.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 38.9 kB
  • After minification 29.0 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.9 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 770.2 kB
  • After minification 770.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JULLIAN images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 98.8 kB

  • Original 421.7 kB
  • After minification 421.7 kB
  • After compression 323.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.8 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 170 B

  • Original 36.0 kB
  • After minification 36.0 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jullian.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (23%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JULLIAN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jullian.net

jullian.net

252 ms

659 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

70 ms

vendors.min.css

vendors.min.css

205 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

755 ms

api.js

api.js

41 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

570 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

943 ms

ClassicGM.jpg

ClassicGM.jpg

1172 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

856 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

857 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

857 ms

prod-cat_1.jpg

prod-cat_1.jpg

926 ms

prod-cat_2.jpg

prod-cat_2.jpg

1096 ms

prod-cat_3.jpg

prod-cat_3.jpg

1070 ms

prod-cat_4.jpg

prod-cat_4.jpg

1089 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

51 ms

uc.js

uc.js

25 ms

urban-sprite-redux.png

urban-sprite-redux.png

215 ms

plus--white-2.svg

plus--white-2.svg

280 ms

bg-parallax_1.jpg

bg-parallax_1.jpg

383 ms

bg-parallax_2.jpg

bg-parallax_2.jpg

468 ms

cd-top-arrow.svg

cd-top-arrow.svg

362 ms

FrutigerLTStd-Roman.woff

FrutigerLTStd-Roman.woff

361 ms

Palatino.woff

Palatino.woff

469 ms

FrutigerLTStd-Light.woff

FrutigerLTStd-Light.woff

462 ms

jullian-icons.ttf

jullian-icons.ttf

482 ms

home-02_large.jpg

home-02_large.jpg

497 ms

Accessibility Review

jullian.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jullian.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jullian.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jullian.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jullian.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jullian.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JULLIAN. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: