5.3 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.9 sec
240 ms
Click here to check amazing Jupitech content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jupitech.net
Visit jupitech.netWe analyzed Jupitech.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
jupitech.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.088
92/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
1129 ms
77 ms
188 ms
168 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Jupitech.net, 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jupitech.net.
Page size can be reduced by 3.3 MB (71%)
4.7 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Jupitech.net main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jupitech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 934.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 934.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jupitech.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (52%)
67
32
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jupitech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jupitech.net
1129 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
77 ms
styles.css
188 ms
settings.css
168 ms
css
25 ms
css
38 ms
css
47 ms
settings.css
151 ms
css
44 ms
style.css
157 ms
font-awesome.min.css
160 ms
js_composer.css
369 ms
css
46 ms
main.min.css
417 ms
font-awesome.min.css
224 ms
fontello.min.css
226 ms
custom-1d9a799b64.css
440 ms
media-48a710f5ed.css
257 ms
style.css
289 ms
Defaults.css
297 ms
ultimate.min.css
493 ms
jquery.js
479 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
360 ms
lightbox.js
455 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
546 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
487 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
558 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
558 ms
ultimate.min.js
709 ms
css
44 ms
font-awesome.css
593 ms
jquery.form.min.js
599 ms
scripts.js
609 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
590 ms
scripts.js
590 ms
main.min.js
880 ms
wp-embed.min.js
687 ms
js_composer_front.js
684 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
19 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
19 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
19 ms
skin07s.general-boxed-bg-image.jpg
219 ms
banner01.jpg
404 ms
banner2.jpg
404 ms
laptop1.jpg
404 ms
tech-support.png
93 ms
network1.png
126 ms
mobilewebsites.png
402 ms
print_design.png
403 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
234 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
405 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
416 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
398 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
411 ms
logo1-1.png
293 ms
Missionhaiti_oea-250x250.jpg
408 ms
horebsda-250x250.jpg
416 ms
calunah-250x250.jpg
409 ms
atlantic-250x250.jpg
415 ms
EOH-250x250.jpg
458 ms
gmhc_logo.jpg
416 ms
AHC_logo.jpg
466 ms
Horeb_logo.png
461 ms
bethanie_logo.png
512 ms
EOH_logo.png
497 ms
arm_logo.png
508 ms
logobw.png
500 ms
logos.png
536 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
669 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
741 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
749 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
9 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
21 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
20 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
21 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
19 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
20 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
20 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
20 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
21 ms
revicons.woff
174 ms
jupitech.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jupitech.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jupitech.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jupitech.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jupitech.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jupitech.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jupitech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: