4.5 sec in total
306 ms
3.9 sec
291 ms
Click here to check amazing Jutge content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jutge.org
Visit jutge.orgWe analyzed Jutge.org page load time and found that the first response time was 306 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
jutge.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.215
58/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
306 ms
1241 ms
239 ms
581 ms
351 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Jutge.org, 26% (12 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 21% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jutge.org.
Page size can be reduced by 355.6 kB (60%)
592.0 kB
236.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jutge.org main page is 592.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 251.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.6 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jutge needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.7 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 173.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 173.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jutge.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (41%)
44
26
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jutge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jutge.org
306 ms
jutge.org
1241 ms
bootstrap.min.css
239 ms
dataTables.responsive.css
581 ms
font-awesome.min.css
351 ms
tabdrop.css
338 ms
style.css
821 ms
xajax_core.js
442 ms
jquery.min.js
507 ms
jquery.cookie.js
478 ms
bootstrap.min.js
485 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
700 ms
dataTables.bootstrap.min.js
606 ms
bootstrap-tabdrop.min.js
592 ms
dashboard-demo-xs.png
228 ms
dashboard-demo.png
409 ms
upc.png
232 ms
fib.png
203 ms
fme.png
143 ms
oie.png
132 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
480 ms
sdk.js
252 ms
36 ms
xd_arbiter.php
279 ms
like_box.php
108 ms
FbUd6dZS1Af.css
166 ms
dGJLq38YL-C.css
205 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
280 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
350 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
300 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
300 ms
10408787_380070238784335_9026000691184423161_n.jpg
215 ms
525164_230905853700775_1221682726_n.jpg
252 ms
12196100_1510969395889480_5127756568745370259_n.jpg
292 ms
12376224_10206640842653075_8598337248761062618_n.jpg
324 ms
12376219_10207426267407318_5643761468827695787_n.jpg
326 ms
10409742_10205377566712416_2982042511012110072_n.jpg
361 ms
995061_10201542677871926_1833855235_n.jpg
332 ms
12274655_370815016422345_7568563489768554823_n.jpg
331 ms
12549129_10208385695230918_682520185369598173_n.jpg
391 ms
12308426_778312952291536_6912344504726545854_n.jpg
359 ms
162642_184583821554641_1655585_n.jpg
360 ms
1932408_10202539975433081_8645135467967311788_n.jpg
370 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
44 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
45 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
39 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
79 ms
jutge.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
jutge.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jutge.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jutge.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jutge.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jutge.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jutge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: