1.7 sec in total
81 ms
1.5 sec
192 ms
Visit jw.com now to see the best up-to-date Jw content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jw.com
Jackson Walker continues to advance the world of business, with more than 500 attorneys serving clients around the world from our six Texas-based offices.
Visit jw.comWe analyzed Jw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
jw.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.448
20/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
81 ms
642 ms
117 ms
88 ms
229 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Jw.com, 61% (28 requests) were made to Images.jw.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to A.collective-media.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (642 ms) belongs to the original domain Jw.com.
Page size can be reduced by 573.8 kB (51%)
1.1 MB
551.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Jw.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 650.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.0 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jw images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 422.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 422.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (64%)
42
15
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jw.com
81 ms
www.jw.com
642 ms
reset-fonts-grids.css
117 ms
jw_forms.css
88 ms
jw.css
229 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
165 ms
divbox.css
133 ms
jw_2012.css
174 ms
newwindow.js
124 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
298 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
377 ms
jquery.carousel.min.js
203 ms
styleswitcher.js
202 ms
divbox.js
211 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
275 ms
addthis_widget.js
14 ms
wsv2.cgi
222 ms
152.png
63 ms
lg-share-en.gif
11 ms
bg2.png
148 ms
header.png
189 ms
input_bg.png
64 ms
125_badge.png
64 ms
gray_dot.png
65 ms
waggoner.jpg
107 ms
97.jpg
94 ms
93.jpg
105 ms
star.png
106 ms
twitter.gif
135 ms
rss.gif
140 ms
DallasMoveBanner.png
171 ms
arrow_main.gif
133 ms
attylogin.gif
160 ms
Vollkorn-Regular-webfont.woff
63 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
300lo.json
38 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
30 ms
collect
30 ms
datapair
36 ms
datapair
31 ms
datapair
32 ms
datapair
34 ms
jw_big.css
44 ms
pixel
21 ms
pixel
22 ms
nada.gif
142 ms
jw.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jw.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jw.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jw.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: