8.3 sec in total
2.7 sec
5.2 sec
457 ms
Visit jwt.li now to see the best up-to-date JWT content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jwt.li
Immobilien sind unsere Leidenschaft. Ob Sie in Liechtenstein mieten, kaufen oder bauen möchten - wir begleiten Sie professionell und zuverlässig.
Visit jwt.liWe analyzed Jwt.li page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
jwt.li performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.089
92/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
2661 ms
25 ms
308 ms
213 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Jwt.li, 9% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Jwt.li.
Page size can be reduced by 631.8 kB (20%)
3.2 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Jwt.li main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JWT images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 366.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 366.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jwt.li needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 135.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (53%)
38
18
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JWT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jwt.li
2661 ms
css
25 ms
styles.css
308 ms
customize.css
213 ms
css
38 ms
settings.css
207 ms
f73fe3c1a1f7.css
219 ms
d71aba2f2ed1.js
331 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
309 ms
galleria-1.4.2.js
589 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
416 ms
colorbox.min.js
404 ms
selectnav.min.js
493 ms
doubletaptogo.js
496 ms
scripts.js
514 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
logo.png
197 ms
Malbun.jpg
611 ms
Vaduz-F.jpg
790 ms
Boje_003%5B1%5D_Slider.jpg
815 ms
Dalahala-Aussen%20hell-2015-12-10_SLIDER.jpg
794 ms
OG1_Balkon_Dach_01%20-%20Kopie.jpg
710 ms
timer.png
389 ms
pattern.png
593 ms
view%20to%20main%20house%20and%20library.jpg
1117 ms
IMG_2017.JPG
1113 ms
Vaduz-01.jpg
1272 ms
Garlanga--Mauren.jpg
1612 ms
Boje_017.jpg
1191 ms
IMG_1489.JPG
1150 ms
page1.jpg
1940 ms
ga.js
38 ms
loader.gif
1252 ms
jwt.li
1640 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
31 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMw1o1eFRj7wYC6JbISqOjY.ttf
31 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEMbjGELOEJD5J8DUmxkO-A.ttf
31 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
31 ms
icons.woff
1680 ms
collect
21 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
coloredbg.png
594 ms
arrow_left2.png
658 ms
arrow_right2.png
789 ms
jwt.li accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jwt.li best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jwt.li SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jwt.li can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jwt.li main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jwt.li
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JWT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: