Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

m2.juma.de

Web Server's Default Page

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

423 ms

Resources Loaded

866 ms

Page Rendered

112 ms

m2.juma.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing M 2 Juma content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about m2.juma.de

Visit m2.juma.de

Key Findings

We analyzed M2.juma.de page load time and found that the first response time was 423 ms and then it took 978 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

m2.juma.de performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

m2.juma.de

423 ms

style.css

98 ms

panel-logo.png

176 ms

parallels-logo.png

178 ms

top-bottom.png

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to M2.juma.de and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (423 ms) belongs to the original domain M2.juma.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 15.4 kB (19%)

Content Size

80.4 kB

After Optimization

65.0 kB

In fact, the total size of M2.juma.de main page is 80.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 66.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 7.5 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 66.9 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M 2 Juma images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 4.7 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M2.juma.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M 2 Juma. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

m2.juma.de accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

m2.juma.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

m2.juma.de SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M2.juma.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that M2.juma.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M 2 Juma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: