4.6 sec in total
837 ms
2.5 sec
1.3 sec
Welcome to screenprotect.jugem.jp homepage info - get ready to check Screen Protect Jugem best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about screenprotect.jugem.jp
ブログやるならJUGEM
Visit screenprotect.jugem.jpWe analyzed Screenprotect.jugem.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 837 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
screenprotect.jugem.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
76/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
837 ms
511 ms
22 ms
338 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Screenprotect.jugem.jp, 32% (34 requests) were made to Imaging.jugem.jp and 10% (11 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (837 ms) belongs to the original domain Screenprotect.jugem.jp.
Page size can be reduced by 171.3 kB (69%)
247.9 kB
76.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Screenprotect.jugem.jp main page is 247.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 109.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Screen Protect Jugem images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 68.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Screenprotect.jugem.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (52%)
91
44
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Screen Protect Jugem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
screenprotect.jugem.jp
837 ms
jm_style.css
511 ms
style.css
22 ms
cookie.js
338 ms
script.js
22 ms
jquery.min.js
41 ms
metallica.css
20 ms
metallica.js
23 ms
fav.js
23 ms
fav.css
20 ms
login_popup.css
25 ms
widgets.js
3 ms
share.js
295 ms
AdLantisLoader.js
556 ms
cookie.js
8 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
B00524BUGW.09.MZZZZZZZ.jpg
59 ms
all_bg.gif
187 ms
search.gif
186 ms
screenprotect.jugem.jp
299 ms
powered_07b.gif
343 ms
bg_header.gif
29 ms
logo_jugem.gif
27 ms
bg_dot.gif
27 ms
logo_pepabo.gif
27 ms
wrapper_bg.gif
337 ms
entry_head.gif
336 ms
add_heart.gif
21 ms
add_bubble.gif
22 ms
lovewindow_b.gif
23 ms
jg_ads_init_inactive.js
18 ms
collect
27 ms
jg_ads_inactive.js
8 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
show_ads_impl.js
51 ms
jg_ads_init_display2.js
8 ms
collect
132 ms
jg_ads_display2.js
12 ms
ads
464 ms
jg_ads_init_bottom_entry.js
18 ms
jg_ads_bottom_entry2.js
19 ms
osd.js
81 ms
ads
436 ms
all_bg.gif
67 ms
search.gif
66 ms
ads
413 ms
share_button.html
373 ms
share_button.html
371 ms
share_button.html
380 ms
share_button.html
374 ms
share_button.html
373 ms
share_button.html
375 ms
share_button.html
792 ms
share_button.html
792 ms
share_button.html
796 ms
share_button.html
798 ms
sdk.js
23 ms
side_bg.gif
191 ms
side_header.gif
191 ms
side_list.gif
270 ms
dd.gif
274 ms
213 ms
xd_arbiter.php
28 ms
xd_arbiter.php
121 ms
header.gif
95 ms
entry_head.gif
176 ms
powered_07b.gif
89 ms
wrapper_bg.gif
92 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
72 ms
adlantis.www.js
203 ms
swfobject.js
493 ms
side_disc.gif
185 ms
side_bottomgif.gif
200 ms
side_bg.gif
83 ms
side_header.gif
79 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.ja.html
48 ms
side_list.gif
36 ms
share_button.php
84 ms
dd.gif
40 ms
share_button.php
125 ms
share_button.php
197 ms
share_button.php
332 ms
share_button.php
317 ms
share_button.php
332 ms
bt_check_6.png
429 ms
share_button.php
304 ms
wy1X4hBW7e7.js
96 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
169 ms
side_disc.gif
68 ms
5894735032636457507
155 ms
abg.js
288 ms
m_js_controller.js
301 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
75 ms
side_bottomgif.gif
51 ms
footer.gif
58 ms
15766017601903413530
299 ms
share_button.php
282 ms
share_button.php
280 ms
share_button.php
344 ms
x_button_blue2.png
107 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
90 ms
s
35 ms
load_script
372 ms
jot.html
43 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
15 ms
screenprotect.jugem.jp accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
screenprotect.jugem.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
screenprotect.jugem.jp SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
JA
EUC-JP
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Screenprotect.jugem.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Japanese language. Our system also found out that Screenprotect.jugem.jp main page’s claimed encoding is euc-jp. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
screenprotect.jugem.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Screen Protect Jugem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: