Access kadhajalakam.com. കഥാജാലകം

Report Summary

About Website

Visit kadhajalakam.com now to see the best up-to-date Kadhajalakam content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kadhajalakam.com

Kadhajalakam is a window to the world of fictional writings by a collective of bloggers they are inspired by the alphabets, life and emotions.

Visit kadhajalakam.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.145

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

www.kadhajalakam.com

222 ms

kE4c1z4-B27GbyfeM3z5cyWaMGWIJqVo7ArZifynljJfe0GgfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9ajcFRZQqUZ2btwc9owRSk5QyywhwuwU7mMPG0ShB7jAtl-cNDZPul5Q8cO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUnjAsGjATydeBnjAX0jhNlOeUzjhBC-eNDifUDjATydKu7daF8OAXo5Aj0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaikonjAsGjATydeBnjAX0jhNlOYiaikoDjATydKu7daF8OAXo5Aj0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlJ6oCiewljcNqdhoTOQIaFPG4fVvnIMMjgfMfH6qJxKCbMg65JMHbM--ukwqB.js

88 ms

css

56 ms

common-977e2fa52a5aa3ac3c27-min.js

72 ms

site.css

245 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Kadhajalakam.com, 56% (15 requests) were made to Static1.squarespace.com and 11% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (245 ms) relates to the external source Static1.squarespace.com.

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Kadhajalakam.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 61.5 kB

Original 75.9 kB
After minification 69.5 kB
After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 79.4 kB

Original 3.4 MB
After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kadhajalakam images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 37.2 kB

Original 89.0 kB
After minification 88.8 kB
After compression 51.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.2 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 271.1 kB

Original 410.9 kB
After minification 410.4 kB
After compression 139.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kadhajalakam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 271.1 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kadhajalakam. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kadhajalakam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kadhajalakam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kadhajalakam.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Kadhajalakam. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

കഥാജാലകം

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)