Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

kafol.net

Kafol.NET

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

186 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

817 ms

kafol.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to kafol.net homepage info - get ready to check Kafol best content for Slovenia right away, or after learning these important things about kafol.net

Fotografije, projekti in eksperimenti

Visit kafol.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Kafol.net page load time and found that the first response time was 186 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kafol.net performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kafol.net

186 ms

kafol.net

397 ms

jquery.js

170 ms

jquery.cycle.js

234 ms

www.kafol.net.js

231 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Kafol.net, 15% (12 requests) were made to Img.youtube.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Kafol.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 272.1 kB (4%)

Content Size

7.7 MB

After Optimization

7.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Kafol.net main page is 7.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 32.6 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 128.1 kB

  • Original 7.5 MB
  • After minification 7.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kafol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 106.7 kB

  • Original 167.5 kB
  • After minification 149.9 kB
  • After compression 60.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 6.2 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kafol.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (7%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

71

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kafol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

kafol.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

kafol.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

kafol.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kafol.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Kafol.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Kafol. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: