3.2 sec in total
612 ms
2.4 sec
193 ms
Click here to check amazing Kosten content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about kosten.de
Wo kann ich entscheidend Kosten senken. Hier finden Sie Tipps und Möglichkeiten effektiv Geld zu sparen
Visit kosten.deWe analyzed Kosten.de page load time and found that the first response time was 612 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
kosten.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value2.9 s
79/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.212
59/100
15%
Value3.9 s
88/100
10%
612 ms
137 ms
260 ms
210 ms
205 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Kosten.de, 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) relates to the external source Homepage-tools.schnelle-online.info.
Page size can be reduced by 517.2 kB (69%)
752.8 kB
235.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Kosten.de main page is 752.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 377.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 791 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kosten images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 223.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.2 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 252.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kosten.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (76%)
67
16
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kosten. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
kosten.de
612 ms
bootstrap.css
137 ms
shariff.complete.css
260 ms
system.css
210 ms
template.css
205 ms
megamenu.css
209 ms
off-canvas.css
212 ms
font-awesome.min.css
211 ms
custom.css
237 ms
jbcookies.css
306 ms
jquery.min.js
412 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
307 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
308 ms
shariff.min.js
363 ms
caption.js
307 ms
bootstrap.js
339 ms
jquery.tap.min.js
406 ms
off-canvas.js
406 ms
script.js
407 ms
menu.js
409 ms
adsbygoogle.js
4 ms
system.css
233 ms
logo-kosten-de.png
172 ms
google.png
171 ms
n-tv.png
173 ms
bild.png
172 ms
welt.png
170 ms
wetteronline.png
169 ms
sportschau.png
211 ms
computerbild.png
212 ms
ebay.png
213 ms
idealo.png
214 ms
msn.png
212 ms
youtube.png
213 ms
facebook.png
304 ms
bing.png
305 ms
n24.png
308 ms
tagesschau.png
307 ms
handelsblatt.png
305 ms
wetter_com.png
307 ms
sport1.png
405 ms
chip.png
404 ms
amazon.png
406 ms
finanzen100.png
407 ms
yahoo.png
408 ms
wikipedia.png
408 ms
twitter.png
542 ms
atomicclock2_1.js
623 ms
google.png
524 ms
ca-pub-1647418858693090.js
49 ms
zrt_lookup.html
44 ms
show_ads_impl.js
88 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
482 ms
piwik.js
357 ms
519 ms
ads
289 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
565 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
28 ms
osd.js
14 ms
ads
254 ms
css
52 ms
m_js_controller.js
25 ms
abg.js
27 ms
css
75 ms
favicon
66 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
44 ms
s
34 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
50 ms
x_button_blue2.png
44 ms
favicon
54 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
6 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
59 ms
kosten.de accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
kosten.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
kosten.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kosten.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kosten.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kosten.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kosten. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: