3.6 sec in total
270 ms
3.3 sec
88 ms
Visit r61-extern.kontur.ru now to see the best up-to-date R 61 Extern Kontur content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about r61-extern.kontur.ru
Visit r61-extern.kontur.ruWe analyzed R61-extern.kontur.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
r61-extern.kontur.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.9 s
0/100
10%
Value15.1 s
0/100
25%
Value14.0 s
2/100
10%
Value1,300 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value17.9 s
4/100
10%
270 ms
557 ms
138 ms
138 ms
525 ms
Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original R61-extern.kontur.ru, 56% (9 requests) were made to Auth.kontur.ru and 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (750 ms) relates to the external source Auth.kontur.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 68.3 kB (59%)
116.6 kB
48.4 kB
In fact, the total size of R61-extern.kontur.ru main page is 116.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 82.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, R 61 Extern Kontur needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
10
10
The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R 61 Extern Kontur. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
r61-extern.kontur.ru
270 ms
r61-extern.kontur.ru
557 ms
index
138 ms
setexternsession.aspx
138 ms
setter.kontur.ru
525 ms
auth.kontur.ru
705 ms
jquery
402 ms
js
750 ms
css
515 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
logo.ashx
138 ms
authIco.png
130 ms
footer__kontur.png
126 ms
button_color_blue.png
132 ms
icon__checkbox.png
220 ms
collect
11 ms
r61-extern.kontur.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
r61-extern.kontur.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
r61-extern.kontur.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise R61-extern.kontur.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that R61-extern.kontur.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
r61-extern.kontur.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R 61 Extern Kontur. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: