7.9 sec in total
745 ms
6.8 sec
408 ms
Click here to check amazing Arms Ltalk content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arms.ltalk.ru
Visit arms.ltalk.ruWe analyzed Arms.ltalk.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 745 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
arms.ltalk.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
91/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value6,070 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.645
9/100
15%
Value12.7 s
14/100
10%
745 ms
617 ms
560 ms
1121 ms
1400 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Arms.ltalk.ru, 65% (48 requests) were made to Ltalk.ru and 8% (6 requests) were made to Cache.betweendigital.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) relates to the external source Ltalk.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 170.5 kB (71%)
240.2 kB
69.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Arms.ltalk.ru main page is 240.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 92.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Arms Ltalk needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 60.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arms.ltalk.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (90%)
68
7
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arms Ltalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
arms.ltalk.ru
745 ms
main.css
617 ms
style.css
560 ms
main.js
1121 ms
188244.js
1400 ms
188245.js
1401 ms
227163.js
381 ms
apu.php
328 ms
286980.js
385 ms
0.gif
241 ms
design-off.png
612 ms
emp.gif
600 ms
rss20.gif
408 ms
atom03.gif
409 ms
opml11.gif
578 ms
blog.png
582 ms
t.cgi
419 ms
context.js
334 ms
user.png
629 ms
showad_full.js
388 ms
b.gif
585 ms
i.gif
592 ms
u.gif
607 ms
s.gif
766 ms
h.gif
1449 ms
off.gif
785 ms
center.gif
805 ms
right.gif
938 ms
quote.gif
960 ms
clear.png
1436 ms
video.gif
1112 ms
audio.png
1155 ms
blogs.png
4892 ms
translit.gif
1277 ms
smile.png
1849 ms
sad.png
1370 ms
wink.png
1450 ms
kiss.png
1502 ms
big-smile.png
1574 ms
surprised.png
1594 ms
tongue-sticking-out.png
1585 ms
angry.png
1641 ms
devil.png
1736 ms
angel.png
1787 ms
cry.png
1793 ms
upset.png
1830 ms
confused.png
1970 ms
undecided.png
2031 ms
thinking.png
2041 ms
analytics.js
115 ms
floating.js
204 ms
collect
62 ms
context_static_r1084.js
388 ms
cunning.png
1820 ms
tired.png
1822 ms
t.cgi
179 ms
1x1.gif
202 ms
adi
466 ms
adi
455 ms
crazy.png
1707 ms
shhh.png
1747 ms
shocked.png
1746 ms
sun-glasses.png
1756 ms
adi
318 ms
turn-red.png
1639 ms
thumbs-up.png
1685 ms
thumbs-down.png
1732 ms
sep.gif
1746 ms
34376
209 ms
watch.js
1 ms
sync
398 ms
sync
216 ms
admitad
307 ms
match
155 ms
arms.ltalk.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
arms.ltalk.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
arms.ltalk.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arms.ltalk.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arms.ltalk.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
arms.ltalk.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Arms Ltalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: