Tools & Wizards About Us
console.l2thinktank.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

console.l2thinktank.com

Gartner Login

Page Load Speed

538 ms in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

426 ms

Page Rendered

80 ms

console.l2thinktank.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Console L 2 Thinktank content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about console.l2thinktank.com

Visit console.l2thinktank.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Console.l2thinktank.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 506 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

console.l2thinktank.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

46/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

console.l2thinktank.com

32 ms

L2console.css

5 ms

l2console.nocache.js

6 ms

clean.css

9 ms

undefined.cache.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Console.l2thinktank.com, 17% (1 request) were made to Bugherd.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (363 ms) relates to the external source Bugherd.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.0 kB (80%)

Content Size

46.0 kB

After Optimization

9.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Console.l2thinktank.com main page is 46.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 32.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

  • Original 32.9 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Console.l2thinktank.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Console L 2 Thinktank. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

console.l2thinktank.com

console.l2thinktank.com

32 ms

L2console.css

L2console.css

5 ms

l2console.nocache.js

l2console.nocache.js

6 ms

clean.css

clean.css

9 ms

undefined.cache.js

undefined.cache.js

8 ms

sidebarv2.js

sidebarv2.js

363 ms

Accessibility Review

console.l2thinktank.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

console.l2thinktank.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

console.l2thinktank.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Console.l2thinktank.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Console.l2thinktank.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

console.l2thinktank.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Console L 2 Thinktank. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: