10 sec in total
575 ms
9.2 sec
162 ms
Welcome to digitalcommons.lmu.edu homepage info - get ready to check Digital Commons Lmu best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about digitalcommons.lmu.edu
Visit digitalcommons.lmu.eduWe analyzed Digitalcommons.lmu.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 575 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
digitalcommons.lmu.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
28/100
10%
Value58.0 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.755
6/100
15%
Value31.9 s
0/100
10%
575 ms
17 ms
249 ms
496 ms
499 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalcommons.lmu.edu, 13% (14 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Assets.bepress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Assets.bepress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 680.7 kB (60%)
1.1 MB
450.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Digitalcommons.lmu.edu main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 588.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Commons Lmu images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 376.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 376.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 185.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalcommons.lmu.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (79%)
100
21
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Commons Lmu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
digitalcommons.lmu.edu
575 ms
yui-min.js
17 ms
ir-style.css
249 ms
ir-custom.css
496 ms
ir-local.css
499 ms
jsUtilities.js
496 ms
footnoteLinks.js
1288 ms
dc-mobile-nav.js
739 ms
jquery.min.js
82 ms
mobile-scale.js
1066 ms
fastclick.js
723 ms
scroll.js
724 ms
fixed-responsive-nav.js
728 ms
hide-nav.js
949 ms
jsapi
35 ms
gfslideshow.js
38 ms
rdr.js
943 ms
d3.v2.js
2185 ms
sunburst.pack.js
954 ms
floatbox.css
463 ms
floatbox.js
1212 ms
bpbootstrap-20131105.pack.js
1190 ms
gfslideshow.js
23 ms
ir-reset.css
962 ms
ir-layout.css
1305 ms
ir-assets.css
1192 ms
ir-left.css
1202 ms
ir-submit.css
1222 ms
ir-article.css
1546 ms
ir-feed.css
1444 ms
ir-network.css
1459 ms
ir-adapt.css
1740 ms
dc-mobile-nav.css
1563 ms
ir-deprecate.css
499 ms
global-alert.css
491 ms
grid.css
497 ms
ir-utilities.css
767 ms
combo
13 ms
fd00900d3fa5d9351694d1fb95034d68.gif
262 ms
8e240588cf8cd3a028768d4294acd7d3.png
514 ms
ccece9e19d081063c2c48f5096a0c064.gif
263 ms
40364cf1abc806c84e45eb2e0849a716.gif
267 ms
5087be6f1c947caeb6b25ba9dff261e7.gif
262 ms
759b0642e2db98e1f11ced811849b9ed.gif
268 ms
eae68fe4fb9686065583c4d41433bba4.gif
467 ms
881751de1e5a1697d62845e7e98d4d5f.gif
508 ms
9029bae55734906db0d06c06b4b9cd0a.gif
510 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1749 ms
responsivenav.ttf
525 ms
15 ms
default+en.css
4 ms
default+en.I.js
6 ms
2bc1ef6e9490ca8f74e71ec0993bd35f.gif
666 ms
json
1071 ms
disciplines.json
657 ms
da8873b2267d1f55d555e2d36920d768.gif
909 ms
04f121a3969fe1869333abd41b5e968a.gif
699 ms
f57b3727161849bf0c6015e13f6c4281.gif
699 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
followable.css
860 ms
options.js
876 ms
collect
12 ms
DC_Logo_small.svg
240 ms
webservice-base-20131105.pack.js
252 ms
followable-20131105.pack.js
255 ms
combo
4 ms
index.html
263 ms
core_534.js
517 ms
combo
4 ms
combo
7 ms
combo
5 ms
followconfig.json
256 ms
readershipMap.css
235 ms
socket.io.js
1006 ms
js
75 ms
readershipMap.embed.js
465 ms
tooltip_534.js
257 ms
ir-print.css
251 ms
analytics.js
55 ms
digitalcommons.png
227 ms
dc-embedsplash-09.png
3405 ms
Gfeeds
457 ms
common.js
36 ms
map.js
35 ms
us.png
254 ms
json
310 ms
util.js
16 ms
onion.js
45 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
139 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
27 ms
stats.js
25 ms
controls.js
76 ms
blank.gif
294 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
56 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
59 ms
transparent.png
60 ms
vt
44 ms
css
59 ms
google4.png
27 ms
mapcnt6.png
27 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
15 ms
tmapctrl.png
32 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
55 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
69 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
80 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
96 ms
digitalcommons.lmu.edu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
digitalcommons.lmu.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
digitalcommons.lmu.edu SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Digitalcommons.lmu.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Digitalcommons.lmu.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
digitalcommons.lmu.edu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Digital Commons Lmu. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: