1 sec in total
60 ms
817 ms
158 ms
Visit gilcargillcom.litmos.com now to see the best up-to-date Gilcargillcom Litmos content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gilcargillcom.litmos.com
Log-in to the worlds easiest to use Learning Management System
Visit gilcargillcom.litmos.comWe analyzed Gilcargillcom.litmos.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 975 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
gilcargillcom.litmos.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value4.6 s
34/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.0 s
65/100
10%
60 ms
26 ms
189 ms
192 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Gilcargillcom.litmos.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Static1.litmos.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (241 ms) relates to the external source Static1.litmos.com.
Page size can be reduced by 118.9 kB (55%)
217.0 kB
98.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Gilcargillcom.litmos.com main page is 217.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 126.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 821 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gilcargillcom Litmos images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 58.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gilcargillcom.litmos.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 54.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)
17
7
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gilcargillcom Litmos. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gilcargillcom.litmos.com
60 ms
26 ms
189 ms
login.css
192 ms
jquery.js
241 ms
theme.ashx
63 ms
css
67 ms
css
79 ms
conversion.js
41 ms
ba846b9a-fc31-484d-808c-3115b15b769a.png
100 ms
bg-l.gif
71 ms
ga.js
33 ms
client:plusone.js
49 ms
53 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
collect
105 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
84 ms
postmessageRelay
52 ms
ga-audiences
24 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
30 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
35 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
gilcargillcom.litmos.com accessibility score
gilcargillcom.litmos.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gilcargillcom.litmos.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gilcargillcom.litmos.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gilcargillcom.litmos.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gilcargillcom.litmos.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gilcargillcom Litmos. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: