5.2 sec in total
338 ms
4.7 sec
236 ms
Visit ladybird.dk now to see the best up-to-date Ladybird content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ladybird.dk
Visit ladybird.dkWe analyzed Ladybird.dk page load time and found that the first response time was 338 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ladybird.dk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
96/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.072
96/100
15%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
338 ms
2134 ms
221 ms
346 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ladybird.dk, 97% (34 requests) were made to Ladygirl.dk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Ladygirl.dk.
Page size can be reduced by 775.6 kB (60%)
1.3 MB
514.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Ladybird.dk main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 862.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ladybird images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 615.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 615.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ladybird.dk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (76%)
33
8
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ladybird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ladybird.dk
338 ms
ladygirl.dk
2134 ms
style.css
221 ms
prettyPhoto.css
346 ms
bbppu.css
231 ms
bbpress.css
235 ms
style.css
234 ms
dashicons.min.css
407 ms
desktop_style.css
330 ms
styles.css
352 ms
wp-whos-online.css
350 ms
ladygirl.dk
687 ms
jquery.js
855 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
465 ms
prettyPhoto.js
581 ms
wp-ajax-response.min.js
465 ms
scripts.js
729 ms
bbppu.js
573 ms
front_end_script.js
570 ms
wp-whos-online.js
690 ms
ckeditor.js
1696 ms
ckeditor.utils.js
708 ms
ckeditor.comment-reply.js
791 ms
editor.js
646 ms
jquery.form.min.js
662 ms
scripts.js
684 ms
wp-embed.min.js
752 ms
style.css
1047 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
250 ms
background-texture.png
118 ms
img_background_page.jpg
243 ms
kkkkk.png
150 ms
icons.png
238 ms
content-texture-top.png
149 ms
img_background_header.png
583 ms
ladybird.dk accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.
ladybird.dk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
ladybird.dk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ladybird.dk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Danish language. Our system also found out that Ladybird.dk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ladybird.dk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ladybird. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: