7.7 sec in total
778 ms
5.8 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Lafate Web Design content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lafatewebdesign.com
Our low cost web designer develops scalable websites delivering what you need today in your website and adding future features as your business grows.
Visit lafatewebdesign.comWe analyzed Lafatewebdesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 778 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
lafatewebdesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.7 s
0/100
10%
Value15.3 s
0/100
25%
Value23.9 s
0/100
10%
Value18,290 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.169
70/100
15%
Value37.5 s
0/100
10%
778 ms
79 ms
218 ms
210 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Lafatewebdesign.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Formilla.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lafatewebdesign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 814.1 kB (22%)
3.7 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Lafatewebdesign.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 82.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 303.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lafate Web Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 392.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lafatewebdesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 392.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (63%)
52
19
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lafate Web Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lafatewebdesign.com
778 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
79 ms
formidablepro.css
218 ms
frontend-render.css
210 ms
css
63 ms
style.css
144 ms
content-sidebar.css
145 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
160 ms
bootstrap.min.css
146 ms
main.css
214 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
368 ms
default.css
295 ms
general_foundicons.css
203 ms
social_foundicons.css
247 ms
otw_shortcode.css
263 ms
sg_popup_core.js
259 ms
jquery.js
380 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
302 ms
sliphover.js
322 ms
bootstrap.min.js
318 ms
bxslider.min.js
328 ms
stellar.js
368 ms
custom.js
381 ms
inboundAnalytics.min.js
392 ms
spin.min.js
399 ms
navigation.js
395 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
423 ms
wp-embed.min.js
436 ms
font-awesome.min.css
288 ms
analytics.js
307 ms
gs_async.js
359 ms
1PsBFTzovqI
440 ms
twitter.png
267 ms
youtube.png
267 ms
Optimized-lwd-banner-lady-with-laptop.jpg
646 ms
Optimized-lwd-banner-thumbs-up.jpg
547 ms
lwd-banner-glass-drawing.jpg
1621 ms
pattern.jpg
266 ms
sample-site-300x197.jpg
321 ms
infographics.jpg
320 ms
feedback.js
218 ms
bx_loader.gif
149 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
145 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
237 ms
general_foundicons.woff
275 ms
collect
98 ms
www-player.css
66 ms
www-embed-player.js
172 ms
base.js
335 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
239 ms
collect
243 ms
LoadFormillaChatButton
849 ms
ga-audiences
960 ms
ad_status.js
843 ms
loading.gif
704 ms
chat-bubbles.png
666 ms
iKtgsnIEnramb_phg3pCdiFWxTNl0zmfFT58AYYWou0.js
352 ms
embed.js
149 ms
id
153 ms
lafatewebdesign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
lafatewebdesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lafatewebdesign.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
OG
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lafatewebdesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lafatewebdesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lafatewebdesign.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lafate Web Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: