2.3 sec in total
120 ms
2.2 sec
53 ms
Visit lafebs.org now to see the best up-to-date Lafebs content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lafebs.org
Visit lafebs.orgWe analyzed Lafebs.org page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
lafebs.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.9 s
43/100
10%
120 ms
33 ms
28 ms
1198 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lafebs.org, 38% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 434.6 kB (46%)
952.9 kB
518.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Lafebs.org main page is 952.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 442.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 247.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 247.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lafebs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 182.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.9 kB or 41% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (45%)
22
12
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lafebs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lafebs.org
120 ms
minified.js
33 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
28 ms
polyfill.min.js
1198 ms
thunderbolt-commons.09398ec1.bundle.min.js
25 ms
main.e5a43201.bundle.min.js
66 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
22 ms
lodash.min.js
64 ms
react.production.min.js
24 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
65 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
64 ms
451397_944c205793f844559031270c64aafb15~mv2.png
284 ms
451397_6c66a6a0f4604e988f0acaa626bca4a2~mv2.jpg
538 ms
11062b_18fa50bb72b6446f8beea531457d9875~mv2_d_4000_2033_s_2.jpg
647 ms
451397_9e8e838278c24caaaf0eda765f959f7e~mv2.png
461 ms
ca2fd64e02c942c28982207f45f6c1a0.jpg
397 ms
cropped-logo-site.png
447 ms
451397_9e8e838278c24caaaf0eda765f959f7e~mv2.png
490 ms
bundle.min.js
34 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
33 ms
AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff
32 ms
102 ms
100 ms
100 ms
97 ms
98 ms
92 ms
134 ms
132 ms
131 ms
136 ms
138 ms
137 ms
deprecation-es.v5.html
12 ms
bolt-performance
12 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
3 ms
lafebs.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lafebs.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
lafebs.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lafebs.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Lafebs.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lafebs.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lafebs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: