2.1 sec in total
553 ms
943 ms
623 ms
Visit landingpage.com now to see the best up-to-date LANDING PAGE content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about landingpage.com
Visit landingpage.comWe analyzed Landingpage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 553 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
landingpage.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value7,310 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.06
98/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
553 ms
115 ms
120 ms
371 ms
213 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Landingpage.com, 14% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (553 ms) belongs to the original domain Landingpage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 490.2 kB (66%)
738.9 kB
248.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Landingpage.com main page is 738.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 277.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, LANDING PAGE needs image optimization as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 178.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 230.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Landingpage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 230.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
21
21
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LANDING PAGE. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
landingpage.com
553 ms
style.css
115 ms
gsom.css
120 ms
creditscorebanner.jpg
371 ms
glock2.min.js
213 ms
gsom_s.min.js
96 ms
go.png
96 ms
header_shadow.png
27 ms
pg_bg.png
32 ms
lpg.jpg
240 ms
nav_bg.png
34 ms
sidebar_bg.png
63 ms
rss.png
71 ms
comments.png
75 ms
20140620-040204.jpg
237 ms
bullet.png
104 ms
footer_shadow.png
133 ms
at_EFa0bO4U
107 ms
f1gK-JEXahk
77 ms
q-5ADi3oSf0
62 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
40 ms
www-embed-player.js
65 ms
landingpage.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
landingpage.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
landingpage.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Landingpage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Landingpage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
landingpage.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LANDING PAGE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: