Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

lariva.com

Cartulinas y papelería técnica - La Riva

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

4.6 sec

Page Rendered

230 ms

lariva.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing La Riva content for Spain. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lariva.com

Más de 5.000 referencias de papeles, cartulinas y productos para las Bellas Artes. Visítanos en Madrid o accede a nuestra tienda online

Visit lariva.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lariva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lariva.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,770 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lariva.com

1631 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

342 ms

meteor-slides.css

235 ms

css

37 ms

scrollup.css

245 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Lariva.com, 17% (14 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Lariva.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 781.1 kB (47%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

876.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Lariva.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 938.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 40.0 kB
  • After minification 38.5 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 556.3 kB
  • After minification 546.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. La Riva images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 649.3 kB

  • Original 938.9 kB
  • After minification 911.5 kB
  • After compression 289.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 649.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 122.0 kB
  • After minification 95.8 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lariva.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (59%)

Requests Now

70

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of La Riva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

lariva.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

lariva.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

lariva.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lariva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lariva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of La Riva. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: