4.8 sec in total
399 ms
3.6 sec
831 ms
Welcome to larsongaston.com homepage info - get ready to check Larsongaston best content right away, or after learning these important things about larsongaston.com
If you have a legal issue in or near Los Angeles County, call Larson & Gaston, LLP, at 800-671-8756.
Visit larsongaston.comWe analyzed Larsongaston.com page load time and found that the first response time was 399 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
larsongaston.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value11.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value1,660 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.101
89/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
399 ms
347 ms
330 ms
341 ms
323 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Larsongaston.com, 14% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Larsongaston.wpengine.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Larsongaston.com.
Page size can be reduced by 179.2 kB (7%)
2.7 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Larsongaston.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 165.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 165.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Larsongaston images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Larsongaston.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (61%)
57
22
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Larsongaston. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.larsongaston.com
399 ms
frontend_blocks.css
347 ms
frontend_blocks_responsive.css
330 ms
style.min.css
341 ms
style.min.css
323 ms
styles.css
42 ms
styles.css
366 ms
flexy-breadcrumb-public.css
362 ms
font-awesome.min.css
655 ms
style.css
668 ms
style.css
343 ms
style.css
691 ms
animate.css
354 ms
all.css
134 ms
all.min.css
49 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
362 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
733 ms
front.min.css
734 ms
interactivity.min.js
670 ms
view.min.js
661 ms
jquery.min.js
671 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
971 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
680 ms
script.js
1008 ms
front.min.js
992 ms
js
86 ms
css2
64 ms
index.js
1108 ms
index.js
1108 ms
flexy-breadcrumb-public.js
1109 ms
wpfront-scroll-top.min.js
1296 ms
api.js
71 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1106 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1312 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1478 ms
index.js
1453 ms
icon-mode-phone-light.svg
551 ms
JohnB-new-412x412-1.jpg
501 ms
VictorJ-new-412x412-1.jpg
540 ms
GloriaG-new-412x412-1.jpg
691 ms
Michelle-new-412x412-1.jpg
677 ms
DanielK-new-412x412-1.jpg
772 ms
Business-Law.svg
781 ms
Insurance-Law.svg
752 ms
Business-Litigation.svg
824 ms
Employment-Law.svg
991 ms
Transportation-Law-1.svg
987 ms
LG_Logo_White.svg
618 ms
LG_Logo_final.svg
616 ms
hero-banner.png
1022 ms
mask.jpg
775 ms
PRACTICE.jpg
802 ms
Rectangle41.svg
620 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
131 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
284 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
158 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
320 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
173 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4nY1M2xYkS.ttf
174 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQEl5vuQWP5hY.ttf
282 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQdl9vuQWP5hY.ttf
282 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQWlhvuQWP5hY.ttf
282 ms
co3bmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjornFNsS8.ttf
282 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQAllvuQWP5hY.ttf
358 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
82 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
116 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
102 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
146 ms
CONTACT-US.jpg
650 ms
Group9.png
847 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
30 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
185 ms
app.js
80 ms
recaptcha__en.js
80 ms
arrow-left.png
1059 ms
arrow-rit.png
1263 ms
larsongaston.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
larsongaston.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
larsongaston.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Larsongaston.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Larsongaston.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
larsongaston.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Larsongaston. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: