4.9 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.5 sec
130 ms
Visit laudator.com now to see the best up-to-date Laudator content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about laudator.com
Portfolio de Laudator, illustrateur français. Comporte ses travaux d'illustrations, photomontages et collages d'images ainsi que des entrevues avec
Visit laudator.comWe analyzed Laudator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
laudator.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value340 ms
75/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
1258 ms
160 ms
205 ms
314 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Laudator.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Laudator.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (78%)
1.9 MB
404.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Laudator.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 877.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 877.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 534.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Laudator.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 534.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (84%)
50
8
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Laudator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
laudator.com
1258 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
160 ms
styles.css
205 ms
settings.css
314 ms
woocommerce.css
289 ms
bb-press.css
197 ms
style.css
303 ms
layout.css
264 ms
style.css
384 ms
magnific-popup.css
311 ms
flexslider.css
359 ms
animate-custom.css
416 ms
be-slider.css
410 ms
shortcodes.css
499 ms
masterslider.main.css
525 ms
custom.css
454 ms
chosen.css
490 ms
css
26 ms
jquery.js
879 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
534 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
713 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
764 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
605 ms
comment-reply.min.js
586 ms
jquery.form.min.js
624 ms
scripts.js
662 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
710 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
766 ms
woocommerce.min.js
762 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
766 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
812 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
63 ms
plugins.js
1064 ms
woocommerce.js
1531 ms
be-slider.js
905 ms
js
63 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.22.custom.min.js
1035 ms
script.js
921 ms
masterslider.min.js
1030 ms
be-modules-plugin.js
1101 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
950 ms
be-modules-script.js
1006 ms
jquery.countdown-fr.js
999 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
952 ms
chosen-frontend.min.js
1224 ms
logo_laudator.gif
307 ms
fd_marge_ldt.jpg
460 ms
fondnoir.gif
371 ms
logo_index_laudator.gif
379 ms
photomontage.jpg
769 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
12 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
12 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
13 ms
icomoon.woff
850 ms
collect
10 ms
laudator.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
laudator.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
laudator.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Laudator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Laudator.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
laudator.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Laudator. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: