4.6 sec in total
199 ms
3.7 sec
644 ms
Welcome to lauraville.com homepage info - get ready to check Lauraville best content right away, or after learning these important things about lauraville.com
Visit lauraville.comWe analyzed Lauraville.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lauraville.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value2,280 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
199 ms
588 ms
173 ms
114 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Lauraville.com, 54% (68 requests) were made to Hpmile.com and 25% (31 requests) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Hpmile.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (34%)
3.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Lauraville.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lauraville images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 755.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 755.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lauraville.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (56%)
115
51
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lauraville. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lauraville.com
199 ms
hpmile.com
588 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
styles.css
114 ms
custom_vc_layout.css
116 ms
settings.css
231 ms
font-awesome.min.css
172 ms
style.css
202 ms
base.css
225 ms
grid.css
228 ms
elements.css
392 ms
icon-font-custom.css
342 ms
layout.css
316 ms
magnific-popup.css
336 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
345 ms
css
25 ms
js_composer.css
513 ms
jquery.js
622 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
451 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
621 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
677 ms
twitterfetcher.js
536 ms
isotope.css
483 ms
jquery.form.min.js
596 ms
scripts.js
597 ms
jquery.viewport.js
646 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
716 ms
jquery.simpleplaceholder.js
714 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
716 ms
hoverIntent.js
718 ms
superfish.js
719 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
776 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
820 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
777 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
835 ms
jquery.parallax.min.js
811 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
816 ms
js
26 ms
jquery.gmap.min.js
893 ms
plugins.js
875 ms
scripts.js
904 ms
ajax_calls.js
868 ms
wp-embed.min.js
864 ms
js_composer_front.js
895 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
931 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
HPMile_inset_3.png
326 ms
HPMile_inset_4.png
324 ms
HPMile_inset_2.png
321 ms
hpmile_logo_final.png
412 ms
Homepg_bkgrnd.jpg
1383 ms
Video_Still.jpg
840 ms
Building_slider2.jpg
843 ms
Printers_slider2.jpg
844 ms
transparent.png
837 ms
iso_9001.gif
838 ms
HPMile_inset_3.png
844 ms
HPMile_inset_4.png
858 ms
agrochemical-150x150.jpg
840 ms
Arsoma-250x150.jpg
949 ms
omega-250x150.jpg
950 ms
nilpeter-250x150.jpg
950 ms
helios-250x150.jpg
951 ms
Allied-250x150.jpg
954 ms
Rotoflex-250x150.jpg
976 ms
sba-award-150x150.png
1026 ms
encapsul-Ad-slider2-150x150.png
997 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
68 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
69 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
70 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
70 ms
collect
46 ms
collect
86 ms
iso_9001-150x150.gif
912 ms
g30.png
1086 ms
iconfontcustom.woff
1335 ms
common.js
65 ms
map.js
65 ms
util.js
69 ms
geocoder.js
64 ms
marker.js
67 ms
prev.png
381 ms
next.png
383 ms
loader.gif
385 ms
small_left.png
465 ms
small_right.png
500 ms
onion.js
44 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
77 ms
GeocodeService.Search
147 ms
controls.js
8 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
77 ms
stats.js
72 ms
transparent.png
36 ms
css
74 ms
marker.png
76 ms
google4.png
77 ms
mapcnt6.png
48 ms
sv5.png
45 ms
infowindow.js
24 ms
tmapctrl.png
89 ms
imgs8.png
85 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
59 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
61 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
60 ms
vt
45 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
57 ms
vt
64 ms
vt
57 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
57 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
52 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
53 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
54 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
61 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
98 ms
vt
62 ms
vt
63 ms
lauraville.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lauraville.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
lauraville.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lauraville.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lauraville.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lauraville.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lauraville. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: